cheezsaus01
It was a Mud Shark, not a Red Snapper
cheezsaus01

In an office somewhere in Miami, Pat Riley's trembling hand moves his mouse forward, to the font drop-down, and selects "Comic Sans"

Hey Germany, how many goals can you score? ...about a Brazillion.

I am experiencing a feeling of great pleasure from Brazil's humiliation....if only there was a word in German that precisely defined this emotion.

Totes. I forgot, people who never did LSD have flashbacks too!

I'm a psychologist who conducts research, supervises doctoral students' dissertations, and teaches psychological ethics. According to a press release from Cornell University, this study was funded in part by the US Army Research Office; that makes its failure to provide informed consent to participants a clear

People are not comodities; its wage control, which we already do at the lower end of the labor spectrum. A price is a value on something you buy, which can be applied to labor from a management standpoint, but no one is buying their expertise; its a reward they give themselves.

Jumping from team to team that is missing one piece isn't all that impressive.

No, but a good number of us do. So unless you care more about how good you'll feel giving the thumbs up than how he or she might feel receiving it, leave it alone. A nod or smile of acknowledgment that you might give a stranger in an elevator is fine, but leave it at that.

Well we are equally sick of people like you who misplace your blame.

Can't believe this sexy bear pose didn't work.

It's just the nature of ideologues. Everything must fit in their narrow interpretation of how the world works.

We require licenses and testing to drive cars. BECAUSE they're dangerous. AND there's, like, a whole other purpose to a car BESIDES FUCKING KILLING PEOPLE ARE YOU GODDAMN SERIOUS LISTEN TO YOURSELF "HURR DURR CARS KILL MORE PEOPLE" jesus fucking christ you're really goddamn stupid.

Especially since they aren't facts!

I love how "taking action" now means buying a gun and shooting someone. All other options are so quickly dismissed and we go straight to killing someone as a means of resolution. *slow insane golf clap*

That doesn't make it better. You're making elaborate inferences about people's moral character based on nothing more than a single, inconsequential act that doesn't even rise to the level of a faux-pas. Imagine if you applied this logic to the rest of your life. Would you fire someone for leaving a cup behind at a

see I would just assume they're an asshole at which point I would probably walk out of the interview. There is no reason we should have to respond to trickery by pretending bosses can get away with terrible respect. :/

It's legally okay, but is it really ethical? People go into a job interview expecting to be judged on their merit and, at the most, their etiquette and attitude which are still totally necessary things for employees. They don't expect to be judged on whether the door is cracked open or not or whether you pick up other

Or perhaps this is nothing more than the result of confirmation bias. The first few times that this happened were likely nothing more than a statistical fluke, but because you now assume that people who accept the water will succeed, your demeanor towards those who accept is likely more positive than it is to those

It's not lying, but it's deceptive. People expect and deserve to be evaluated fairly—not with little tricks and gimmicks.

If you fail that test, you are better off. Nobody should intentionally work for a scumbag company that pulls grade school tricks like that. Anyone that pulls things like that is untrustworthy, and do you want to work for a company that is lying to you right off the bat?