In most parts of the country, tap water doesn't work that way.

It's not a question of who the target demo for "What's Love Got to Do with It," though. It's more about reaching an audience who needs to be reassured that the film isn't made by a bunch of hacks (i.e., moviegoers who might be turned off by the fact that Zack Snyder's directing). Everything about this press release…

His Oscar nomination was for "What's Love Got to Do with It." Amy Adams' most recent Oscar nomination was for "The Fighter." It's additional clarification of the description "Oscar nominee."

And, again, I say... no one was "trolling" until you decided to get so defensive about being wrong about something. Next time, just take two seconds to think about whether you're actually contributing to a conversation before jumping on that "submit" button eh, champ?

A 3rd grade understanding of the difference between "criminal" and "civil" is not "due diligence," dude. Sorry you're ignorant, and sorry you seem to take such pride in your ignorance.

You being wrong = me trolling now? Did I mock you, or insult you in any way?

There's nothing for him to "win". These are criminal charges, it's "State v". Any way, article says she got a ticket and everyone went on with their lives, supposedly.

You absolutely don't know what you're talking about, do you?

The $1.00/mo their losing is more than made up by the $.70 or so per transaction their saving by eliminating the mail. Do people really not understand the difference between revenue and costs?

It's not egotism. Only starred commenters can promote the comments of people who have not otherwise been "vetted." Those types of posts generally can't reach (and clutter) the main discussion unless someone with a star gives it credence.

The present progressive was once considered the death of the English language (e.g., "The house is being built." Language evolves. "Their" has been used to denote indeterminate gender for years (if not decades), people understand what it means, and it's less clunky than "his or her." Get over yourself.

You haven't spent much time on the internet, have you?

a) Most places don't — at least fewer and fewer, especially in a city.

That wouldn't be negligence. If he knew the neighbor would go looking for porn, he would be at least reckless (if not an outright accomplice). This is actually a pretty clear example of negligence: any reasonable person knows or should know that you should lock down your wi-fi signal. Fortunately for this guy, not…

Please don't throw around "thought crime," since you clearly don't understand what it means. You could argue that penalizing a pedophile for simply being a pedophile (having sexual thoughts about children) is an example of "thoughtcrime," but if you're viewing child porn online you're taking an action. A criminal…

a) It's not a loophole if he wasn't speeding; b) it doesn't say that he's beaten all forty tickets — at this, point, only five have shown that he wasn't speeding.

I agree, I drill down a lot. I have about 12k songs, and I try to cover a lot of ground when I shuffle (if I want to listen to solid albums, I tend to go vinyl). I have an original white Zune 30, and really enjoyed a lot of aspects of the ecosystem (especially the Zune Pass)

Sorry to come back to this, but it turns out that even what we thought was being said may not have been said:

I currently use my Droid with Mediamonkey. I have three separate playlists for each decade, based on whether the album was actually released in that decade (Date), if the song is drawn from a later compilation ("Original Date"), or if the song became a hit in a later decade ("Top 40 entry date"). Then I can refer to…

@Dr. What?: That's kind of disingenuous. The Zune playlist system is very good , but it is not as powerful as the iTunes model. As a simple example, Zune doesn't (didn't?) allow for playlists that referenced other playlists.