charmed22
Charmed22
charmed22

In UK the burden of proof in criminal cases is on the prosecutor and not the defendant, however you can shift the burden of proof in a case of insanity. In effect, a defendant who wants to be acquitted on the grounds of insanity needs to prove that he is insane.

Because the Italian police have brainwashed them and have convinced them that she did it, this whole case has been completely unfair to her family and yet most people attack them without understanding what has been happening to them.

but I do think it is actually kind of nice that prosecutors (usually) only have one chance to try and convict.

None of them were born in a poor country.

I would say a justice system that kills innocent people is just as fucked, see this is what i mean both justice systems are awful.

Good i thought she was innocent and i do hope this is last time i have to hear about her, i just want to remember Meredith Kercher who has been forgotten or pushed aside. Also just remember that not all British people think that she is guilty because this always happens on posts about her, it is not US VS UK thing.

But the bargains to be had in US are still too much, even the ones that you deem pretty cheap are still very expensive. All Universities across the US are too expensive, this is what we are not agreeing on.

HSBC put the average annual cost of study in the US – including tuition fees and living expenses – at US$36,564 (that is a lot). Multiply by four for most undergraduate courses and by two for most master's degrees, and for the majority of prospective students, attending university in the US is very expensive, also for

But they are still more expensive than most countries, University fees in America for every University is too high.

Yep and it has worked because that should be the headline not the reversible bit, instead the bit about ACA gets brief mention and it is brushed aside.

Well he didn't have a fake ID, also they never said it was a bar they said it was a pub (and owner had no problem with letting him in).

She did acknowledge it in her first op-ed and she spoke about in interviews.

She mentioned it in first op-ed and has spoken about it many times, also no in most countries with universal healthcare it is not just luxury for the rich and she not just writing this op-ed for Americans.

Instead of attacking her you should be attacking the US health system, she also does mention how lucky she is that she can afford it.

strong likelihood that her mother, her grandmother and her aunt did not just "drop dead" from their cancers.

She has written and spoken about how she is lucky to be able to do this because she can afford it, this always gets brought up and instead of attacking her people should be attacking the US health system. She is also is not just aiming this at people in America and most people around the World actually do not have to

Well the US needs to sort out their health care system.

With this writer there is always a spelling mistake or an incorrect fact.

It is legal in some States but it does not make it okay.

I would say Woody Allen is more popular in America than Europe (especially when i went to New York), i would also say that a lot people in Europe who do not work in entertainment industry want Polanski to go to US and face up to crimes, there have so many protests for him to do that, so no people in Europe do not love