charmed212x
Charmed212x
charmed212x

It boggles my mind how quickly people rush to defend celebrities they don’t even know. I love Louis CK’s comedy, but now that I’ve been reading about his behavior, I’m inclined to boycott his work and support his victims. There are SO many stories about him being icky, it should take only one, but even with dozens

but Louis CK is too precious?

I’ll probably get eaten alive for this here (and full disclosure, I haven’t read the books and I don’t care how this storyline plays out there since books =\= show) but I’ll just come out and say it: it REALLY bothers me that this site continues to recap this show. I feel like Jezebel has been a leading media voice in

I’m trying really hard to say this in a way that doesn’t sound rude. Because I really don’t mean to be rude, but the internet always sounds rude and I honestly don’t understand. You basically just listed a bunch of traits and said because I’m like this I don’t get along with women. But women are just people. And in my

They needed a study to figure this out ...?

I think though, if you take into account that like 72% of the population is white and around 12% is black then those numbers look a little bit more skewed.

I can and will do this all day, you peice of shit.

She is leader, Chancellor is a ceremonial position.

Fine print is tricky for even English natives. That is putting way too much thought and effort to pretend to be someone else. But at least you can get a good teaching lesson out of it for your classes! :)

Nah, it’s fine. This person went to a crazy degree to make it seem like she is, in fact, Megyn Kelly. A bunch of people commenting couldn’t even notice the difference, and I was on that website three times before I finally caught the “fine print” she’d hidden in the article.

At the very very bottom of the article, it says this:

Is that actually Megyn Kelly’s site? I’m not disagreeing with you, she’ll most likely be throwing them nothing but wiffle balls, but all the tweets keep quoting some woman named Krystal Heath. I think this is just some whackadoodle maintaining a website to make it look like it’s Megyn Kelly saying this shit.

No, more like make it so that if the school insists on sending their children back home because they were driven there by a woman, the woman in question can report their asses, and they can be fined or otherwise disciplined.

This article suggests the schools are already back tracking over this. Government ministers are already investigating. The schools are independent but still have to obey the law and this is illegal discrimination http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/1…

“In this sense it is no different from the driving ban on women in Saudi Arabia. That it masquerades as a halachic imperative is shameful and disturbing.”

Um they actually state in the article that it’s a non-issue. Did you read it?

New York really is a police State, isn’t it? I assume this is just a continuation of Giuliani’s policy of cracking down on minor crime to maintain the overall peace, such as it is, also known as keeping Blacks and Latinos in line by criminalizing everything they do in certain neighborhoods?

The thing I’m finding sad on top of everything is that a large number of people here and on the guardian article seem not to be able to have any empathy for her; as if feeling bad for her life somehow negates feeling worse for the woman she murdered.

I find it sad you can’t fathom forgiveness at all; I imagine it was extremely hard for him but he’s a good man for managing to get there. The first step I imagine is rehumanising the offender, the criminal justice system and the press dehumanise criminals using words like “monster” and “animal” to forget they are

4) None of the above.