charliekellykingoftherats
CharlieKellyKingofTheRats
charliekellykingoftherats

Packers running back Eddie Lacy’s weight is under constant scrutiny by both his coaches and the media, and head

Now playing

Likeable, maybe, but he’s far from universally respected, he’s said a lot of dumb shit, and he’s kinda creepy. I genuinely like Obama and think he really does/did want the best for the country even if I don’t always think his vision was the right one, but as far as Biden (and Hillary Clinton) go, you don’t spend that

Delete your account.

Theanarchistsneedlogisticalsupport didn’t say the accuser has the advantage when it comes to proof, they said, “she had the advantage of a low threshold of proof” meaning in civil court (more likely than not) compared to criminal court (guilty beyond a reasonable doubt)

Yeah - I have a friend who can be blackout drunk but has appeared to me as stone-cold sober. There’s also the fact that basically 95% of Americans of all sexes have used alcohol to make meeting/hooking up easier (there is an entire trillion dollar industry supporting this) and have hooked up with people who were too

A jury of 8, 6 women and 2 men who listened to the testimony, concluded that the plaintiffs version of events didn’t actually occur. Unless you were there you may stop speculating and defer to the jury verdict, or keep living your life like every accused person is guilty. Is Rose a scumbag? Sure. But he also happens

18/f/fl tee hee hee

A/S/L?

We’ve reached out to the Trump campaign for comment on Ivanka’s cock preferences, and will update if and when we receive a response.

The big revelation here would be that Ivanka Trump doesn’t know about the internet.

Does she not have internet?

Also a noun. At least websters says so.

Exactly. Credibility of both sides plays as a very important factor in situations such as these when the timeline is aged and there isn’t much evidence beyond testimony.

Well, Rose’s attorney’s obligation is to cast doubt on the plaintiff’s story, so it’s not surprising that he’s not interrogating whether his client is dependable and honest. And the burden of proof is on the plaintiff, so they are meant to push back on the evidence she offers.

Doe argued that the texts she sent to Rose that night were out of character for her and therefore suggest that she was drunk “out of her mind” and unable to consent. It’s fair game for Doe’s attorneys to seek to rebut that by pointing to other text messages where she says similar things.

I guess the statement was for the woman in the video. I forgot that I wasn’t on Jezebel.

The way she talked about the money and what she could with it is a dead give away. I was a counselor in college through a program the school offered and I have to say that reaction is very A-typical for rape victims.

Yeah. Maybe something did happen, but when you try to present yourself as borderline virginal and it turns out you’re kind of a groupie...well that’s going to hurt your case.

My favorite part is, “See? This is where we go! He called me the B word! You called me...[inaudible]”