The test they take is crazy.

That's not at all how the article described jitney services. They were all one man shops.

Yeah, but the comparison is between the electric and now.

I assume the good ones are actively trying to fight the stigma. That is why I park my BMW in just one spot and always use my turn signals.

No, if it wasn’t for the Soviets willingness to die, we’d all be speaking German.

They would still have to sell their cars to whoever will deal the actual subscription system. Also, people with even moderate income (not in cities) will want a personal vehicle.

Never said it was, it would be nice though.

Wait? So ford didn't invent the automobile? /s

No, but I imagine voting is nigh impossible if you can't read. Every voting booth I've been to involves reading both the instructions and candidate names.

By that logic, all voting has a poll tax because you have to leave your home to do so and it costs money to leave your home.

Lol. Interesting debate tactic. Call someone racist to nullify their viewpoint. That can still be fixed relatively easily with a voucher or stipend. If getting a free Id is too high a bar, I'm not sure you should be voting. It would be impossible to be both informed politically and have no ability to get a free Id.

Depends, I know some of the states are offering free ids to those without money. If the Id doesn't cost anything, is it still a poll tax?

Compared to a virtually quiet electric motor?

Are you saying a smooth DC hum is less stimulating than a screaming F1 engine?

That's because European election periods aren't perpetual. They have campaign lengths. Nobody (except politicians) want two years of campaigning.

Presidents who find legislation to be not good veto that legislation. This is a revisionist love letter from a Hillary supporter.

I’m curious to see if cultural stereotypes from the old show will remain with such a mutli-national crew.

Hey bro, these broads are good at coding, not math!

He’ll get off, but it will have nothing to do with stereotypes, it will do with them lying on the stand. That isn't to say they are lying about the rape, but any lie on the stand goes to credibility and with reasonable doubt being a high burden, he'll walk.

Sure, but why would they just kind of protect an abuser? Like okay, we will press charges, but torpedo the case we pressed charges on by lying on the stand?