charliefox256
Moist Von Lipwig
charliefox256

It was counter-productive in Victoria II, to the point where in almost all gameplay situations you were better off abolishing it, and it sounds like that’ll be the case here again as well.

Sorry if I offended you RustyBolts, from your comment I understand that I was stating the obvious to you? I did not mean to offend you with it as that was not my intention. I was just trying to say that for me the range is the only issue. My thinking was that others may not like/take issue with it for the looks or the

I tend to like quirky cars so I like the way this looks. The price isnt as expensive as a Tesla and to me I would rather have this over a Leaf, Bolt or Mini. The only thing that ruins it for me is the range. Mazda CLAIMS that it is because most people dont drive that far, however I think thats more of a excuse. If it

Probably because we all realize that Nissan is going to have to compromise on a few things to produce a new model. They don’t have the funds to create a bespoke sports car, and why would they, other bigger manufacturers aren’t even doing that. Also, the Z has always been an extension of the previous model.

Jeep Wrangler. Sorry, I’ve tried to like it. But I can’t. I find it useless at almost everything. I just don’t know why it’s so popular. For running trails sure, but literally anything else? It sucks.

Now, I’m not talking about it’s offroad prowess which stands for itself -- and is often how the press tests it as well. Reality is people pay stupid amounts of money for something they will never take offroad, just for looks. 

BURN! IMO this Benz is a gorgeous car. The fact that it was designed by someone that supported Hitler is irrelevant. If it was relevant we would have the same articles about that Beetle, or the Ford Mo Co.

This car is problematic if (1) it is venerated because of its connection to the Nazi era, and (2) the people venerating it are doing so as a back-handed way to praise Nazi accomplishments. Is there evidence of this in the actions of the owners, the judges, or the Pebble Beach management? Or is the fact that the car

This “article” is such a dumpster fire I don’t even know where to start, so I won’t even try. Just...wow.

Nah.

Definitely a dry goods hopper of some sort. You wouldn't have that steep of a slant in the bottom for liquids. Open top means indoor production use, so probably milling or food factory. 

He wasn’t even up there long enough to fuck a mother. Maybe that should be the definition of motherfucking space, be up there long enough to fuck a mother.

You drove around with your high beams on because you were too lazy to change your bulbs. There’s negative undertones to almost everything you write. Do I really need to say anything more?

Why would you be proud of an article where you complained about another mans accomplishments? Don’t play stupid. This article is complete “hogwash.”

I think the questionable content in this case was your unexplained declaration that we should totally accept one arbitrary definition of space and discount the other. Then proposed another arbitrary standard, which if accepted, would not only remove Gus Grissom and Alan Shepherd from the list of space travelers, but

Let me just say that if I did what he did, I am telling every fucker I know and everyone I meet that I have been to motherfucking space. 

How ever much shade Erik wants to throw on this accomplishment, Virgin Galactic’s ship performed exactly as they planned and expected. In no way did it not achieve what they set out to do yesterday.

No point in fretting over the natural self-selection of idiots. I would honestly find it a point of interest. I’d probably name it the natural selection pool and commission a fiberglass sculpture of the car crashing through he fence as a party piece.

A group was exercising their right to free speech in a non-violent fashion and now you’re celebrating violence against them? Well done, fuck that wholefirst amendment” thing!