Commenting on things and making a show/movie about someone’s life, depicting that person with actors are two wildly different things.

Er, this is the new AV Club, where they only offer attempted-snark with plausible deniability, not any actual commentary.

It is very funny to find someone writing about a guy being famous for being famous on this website. You do know how you make money, right? 

The world just wasn’t ready for a rapper who uses racist lyrics.

What does Mike Tyson have to do with those two pedophiles other than the fact since you couldn’t convince me to agree with your lame personal opinions of canceling people forever you don’t like, you resort to stupid childish personal attacks instead?

The composition of the photo was more than fine. As Murry said though, she could probably have benefited from a lighter colored jacket.

It’s fine, and that’s acceptable as Leibowitz doesn’t nail it out of the park every time. No one forced her to go to Vogue and deal with Wintour/Leibowitz and at the end of the day, it will really only matter what Brown Jackson thinks of it. I’d also like to see a non compressed version of the photo, as I believe…

Only in the mind of snarky idiots like you.

lol. These aren’t “basic tenets.” These are all basically your opinions.

As a photographer, the header photo isn’t terrible. It’s not great either. I’d say it’s generally.... fine, if a bit underexposed. At a photo either pre-dawn or edging past dusk, it’s to be expected they are going for an understated look. Maybe a 1/3 of a stop more exposure on her, but the more I look at it, the more…

I suggest you watch some of what he has done lately. The dude is one of the most real individuals you will ever meet. You are clearly defining him by two moments in his history, the bite and the hangover. Just give him another shot. He is pretty unique individual, honestly i’m impressed with how far he has come.

So unless they repent for their sins and beg for forgiveness, a forgiveness that has to be approved, then they’re never rehabilitated even after they’ve went to prison and was punished by the system, and has behaved well ever since? Showing that he learned from his mistake?

This sounds like you personally refuse to forgive him and want to severely punish and cancel him than any kind of objective forgiveness and rehabilitation. That is your right to think that way, but that’s not how actual forgiveness and rehabilitation works. He hasn’t re-offended and seemingly treats people and women…

I’d honestly say it’s proving himself via passage of time as much as anything. Whatever demons he was clearly battling earlier in life seem to be under control and since leaving prison 25+ years ago he’s been a law-abiding citizen. Whatever he says, he was convicted, served prison time, and hasn’t re-offended.  That’s…

Didn’t Tyson do prison time for his crimes? And isn’t people seeing ex-cons as nothing but criminals a big problem in society? I feel like I have seen several Last Week Tonight about that issue. 

mike tyson is a human being.. if you appreciate humanity and all an individual is capable of then you can see that what tyson has done in his life and where he is now is remarkable. he was brash, brazen, beautiful, scary, and human all the same. he is a very interesting individual. he wasn’t supposed to see the other…

I realize that Mike Tyson has had a VERY troubled past, and he’s done a lot of truly horrible things. I can’t claim to be an expert on what he’s been like in recent years, but by outward appearances he seems to have learned a great deal of humility in his later life. He went to prison as punishment for his crimes. We…

Surely, there’s should be room in cinema for all versions of sex, desire, and intimacy. There is, again, nothing inherently wrong with “two guys going at it.”

The author’s pretty unequivocal about what they find bothersome about the quote, for sure. But, in reading the Rolling Stone piece itself, it seems Styles is describing an effort to “highlight what sex is really like between two men,” and that “men going at it” is the opposite of the tenderness possible in same-sex…

His gender-nonconforming preference doesn’t conform to my preferred gender-nonconformance.