No, they’re not. That’s why the paragraph starts “In that original series, which aired from 1998 to 2006...”

“Let us know what we missed in the comments.”

I don’t see any connection to Brittney Griner or Peng Shuai.

It was a pretty funny text

also, magical negros are hilarious

I hope we can have years of drawn-out hearings that fail to produce meaningful consequences.

He shows up in trailers for movies he’s in?  Wow.

who’s also really sorry that he’s white

He’s probably going to be a sensitive women’s rights crusader

John Larroquette is awesome, but there’s no way this doesn’t suck dick

Something like the kid that shovels your sidewalk letting Noam Chomsky have his own ideas.

It’s apt and poignant still.

It is a really fucking long list!

But like...  just make something new instead.  Old things don’t have to keep going.

“So, yes, Velma takes creative liberties. But they’re not used for surface-level hype.”

It seems to be going without recognition that, yes, Garfield Without Garfield was completely brilliant.

“But this is many women”

Yes.

...did you see that picture of the actor, though?

It isn’t really all that bright for the media to look at this situation and just dunk on McCarthy. Whether it be through him conceding everything imaginable to the extremists in his party or through one of those extremists winding up Speaker, the end result is going to be worse than if McCarthy had just won in the…