Depends what best means.

The old Alfa Romeo V6 looks similarly amazing when you pop the hood.

The question is what’s best, not what’s most esoteric

Oh darn, I was just about to...

“He went on to say he’d “love to see auto manufacturers take some responsibility,” regarding the misuse of performance cars”

Thank you for saying this.

I will give you $10. Not worth any more than that.

Dream car material right there.

If you’re gonna put together a list of the all-time best styled cars, you have to include the XJ220—such a looker.

My Alfa 155 V6 takes the cake. Rear fog lights? On the end of the turn signal stock. Front fog lights? A button on the center console next to your hip. Trunk release button? In the glove box! Gauge cluster dimmer switch? Out of sight next to your knee.

Not better sounding or more fun to drive. In that way, they have regressed.

as a means of conveyance from one place to another? No.

As a former owner of a Busso engined Alfa Romeo 155 (Radwood class winning), I disagree with your assertion that Alfa went downhill in the 90s or that they lost their wackiness.

If anyone buys one of these, even without the markup, you truly are a complete idiot.

Development cycle of the M3:

A brand new Jaguar F-Type R. 575hp, kid was 16. He crashed it.....within a week.

Right car, WRONG transmission. No amount of deals would get me into a car with the cambiocorsa. Manual? SIGN ME UP!

No GXP? No way in hell. That GM 2.4 is a complete dog and sucks the life out of that roadster. The 2.0T OTOH, with a tune, turns that car into a little Corvette.

That is the point - it should not be a supercar. It is an SUV, not a supercar. Compromised for pretenders.

IT’S GOOOOOOOD!!!!!