Wait, how does that work. Google has allowed you to download your collection before. If it's matching your music, that means it's not uploading it. Are they just not going to let you download songs at all any more?

Like Aaron said, it matches your music so you don't have to upload your entire collection. What's good about that is all songs it matches are upgraded to 320kbps. If you have a crappy quality 128kbps song and Google Music matches it, it'll stream in a much higher quality 320kbps bitrate.

That's a bummer. But it's still free and I'd rather be able to stream high quality songs with crappy local files than nothing at all.

Yeah you're going to have problems with any navigation app/device you use. Some just have more problems than others.

Thanks for the laugh.

I guess I'm not a people then because I'm not a professional and I don't believes Macs can't get viruses.

The people that don't think it's that bad probably don't use it much or at all. Yeah, if you type in an exact address and Apple has that address in the correct location, you're not going to have any problems with it. But when you start actually searching for things, it's nowhere near as good as Google's maps.

I suppose you'd also have somebody buy a dedicated MP3 player to listen to music because, you know, the pmp industry is falling.

Exactly

What? When did I say Asian was a color?

Yeah that's the problem. People are conditioned to consider describing someone by their skin color as inappropriate when there shouldn't be anything wrong with it. If I'm in a group with a bunch of dark-haired people and someone describes me as "the blond guy" I wouldn't be offended, so why should I get offended if…

You're just as bad as he is. You might even be more stupider.

Me. All the time. If I'm using my iPad and need to take a picture, why would I put it down to take a pic with my phone?

Obviously because being fat sucks and people don't want you pointing that out.

Hopefully all carriers will be doing this soon. It should drive the price of phones down. Spending $50-100 more on the phone you really want isn't a big deal to a lot of people when you're only paying $100-$200 for a phone, but when you look at off contract prices, I think more people would be quicker to buy phones…

Yeah, in some areas because I can't say for certain in all areas since that's probably not true. Difference in coverage is Sprint has LTE in only 43 markets as of November 26 while T-Mobile has had 42Mbps HSPA+ in 163 markets for over a year now. They have 21Mbps HSPA+ in even more markets, and in some of the areas…

The only Star Trek I've seen is the 2009 movie so I have nothing else to compare these movies to. Guess that's why I like them.

T-Mobile's HSPA+ is probably faster than Sprint's LTE. I did a speed test on a T-Mobile Galaxy S III and on my Verizon Galaxy Nexus and they both got almost the exact same download speeds (13Mbps), though my phone did get 4x the upload speed and half the ping. I've seen much better tests than that though. I've seen…

Very similar, but still not the same. Looking at the ingredients of both, you can tell they will taste different.

I don't mind them adding features to Android. I just don't like the design changes they make. I don't mind Sense too much though I still don't think it looks as nice as pure Android. TouchWiz adds a lot of useful features to Samsung phones, but it's one of the ugliest skins I've ever seen.