changezkhan
changezkhan
changezkhan

“I regret that I’m attached to a situation that is so evil, and is so vile,” he told Fox News.

Your Cute Rhyming Hed Makes Me Wish You Were Dead

Is there a Who Can Be The Worst contest going on that nobody told me about? It would explain sooo much.

Okay, so I am in a bad mood, granted, but this is so far out of my ken as an ordinary citizen that I am not feeling it. I understand that women actors in Hollywood are up in arms over smaller paychecks than their male counterparts are granted and well they should be, but how does this impact us as a whole? So Jennifer

Potter’s family is really regretting the decision not to stage an intervention before he hit rock bottom.

That sounds awesome, plus we can probably use her blood to create an elixir that will eradicate norovirus from the planet.

Who are terrorists? You mean those people who stood up against an invading army that hopelessly outmatched them? Terrifying indeed.

America is my homeland. Though it would never happen and the commenter who pointed this out is a moron at best, if America somehow became hostile to Jews and did not want me in it because I was born Jewish, Israel would not then be my homeland — I would not have a homeland.

Bullshit. They'll welcome you if you fit their narrow box of what Judaism means. I know a guy who was raised Conservative and married an Israeli woman. He tried to emigrate to Israel and they wouldn't let him. Why? Because his birth mother — a woman he had not seen since he was 4, as opposed to his Jewish stepmother

I just want to point out that you just said, "your beliefs are your choice, but they're not your choice because you need to have a solid theological reason to not be part of the religion of your birth."

Weird, it's almost as though living in occupied territory and constantly suffering retaliatory overreaction strikes from your wealthy heavily militarized neighbor in reaction to a few assholes in your government shooting glorified fireworks at them will breed resentment somehow.

From the sound of it, your parents are still alive, so it's pretty grim and unnecessary for you to form a philosophy based on the assumption that they will die in exactly that way. Also, while you know police officer's who have died in the line of duty, we've all heard of innocent people being injured or killed by

I think context is a big part of it. A lot of elementary-school kids and senior citizens have been tased in the last few years, and I think people are getting really angry. Of course in this instance the officer might have been totally justified, but most of the taser incidents I've seen written up have been of the

We expect police officers to respect the law and to act with restraint. There is no hypocrisy in that. The taser is over used - period. It was meant to replace a gun with non-lethal alternative - meaning it should only be used when you would have otherwise had to have used a gun. However, it has too often become a

Tazing can be lethal, so your statements about using "non-lethal measures" don't really apply. As for your question "at what point does it become the cop's responsibility to take the risk of being shot over tasing some goober who couldn't be arsed to cooperate"? Any time there is not a clear and present danger. A cop

Tasing is supposed to replace gunfire. Sorry. I disagree that it should be employed to subdue someone resisting arrest.

Here's my 'shop!

Now playing

Used to be in a punk band with Craig Ferguson, was excellent in the Pompeii episode, played a right bastard on Torchwood, and an all-around excellent actor. I'm quite content with this choice.