ok, the monetization is “trash”, “garbage”.

what kind of post is this? this is exactly what everyone was expecting, and it looks a bit nasty.

after playing poe, i don’t know there is much blizzard could do with d4 to  convert from poe.

they absolutely do get it.  its not an act of stupidity.

pretty sure there is depictions of nudity in d2. d3 though seemed very obviously geared towards not throwing up red flags for parents to buy the game for their children. very sunday morning cartoon.

i think the crowd that would disagree with thinking they are both a bit nasty is relatively small and you are likely not to find too many of them here.

yeah its really fantastic. i usually bounce of roguelights, but its a delight to play and the aesthetics / story are all very intriguing. the setting reminds me of a from soft game that took inspiration from beksinski and gieger instead of beksinski and tolkein.

no that sounds cool though maybe ill check it out.

yeah i’ve never played a game i understood less than this one. i know there are people who enjoyed it, but to me the decision to double the player count in roughly the same size maps seemed to start and end with “hey remember when you dreamed about this kind of thing as a kid?” like jingling a set of keys in front of…

i cant remember if redrick had random rolls, but i know randy’s only had one roll. you should be able to pull up that same version of it out of your weapon collection screen like you would an exotic, unless i’m crazy mistaken.

cant you just pull those out of your collections?

humanity is at the brink of extinction and i just cant believe the only thing we have left to stop it is Melvin Cum.

i dont think its healthy to place equal importance on a series of pixels you pay money to dress up in a finite set of outfits created by a very large corporation versus your flesh and blood body.

overwatch 1 was still one of the most toxic games i’ve ever played though? i’m not sure the scoreboard was the culprit.

amen

i think thats actually impossible to avoid really with these types of games. its worth the effort in trying, but it seems to me like its counter productive to force each item to have equal value, rather than keep 50% of the items viable and 5-10% of them powerful enough to actually be sought after.

yeah some OP weapon is only fun if you have a frame of reference as to what that experience is like where you have to actually engage your brain. even then, its a temporary novelty. the skinner box of RPGs generally relies on that overpowered state being the end goal and tends to immediately fall apart when there is…

the term power is so incredibly relative as to make most of your point mean seemingly nothing. if you buff everything in a game to the level of the most powerful item, typically it turns that game into a completely different game.

i mean really... the filming of a skate part would consist of something crazy like at least 75% moving around off the board instead of actually being on it trying a trick.

nah people definitely use three flip too as shorthand, havent you ever heard someone use three shuv?  tre sounds better though, the best name for the best move.