chadp
chadp
chadp

Computer simulations aren't facts. They're guesses based on inherent biases in the computer simulation software.

The climate scientists have proven nothing. They set up the temperature probes in areas that would justify their agenda like around asphalt, on top of buildings, in cities. Of course these areas are going to be warmer than other areas. These samples are not representative of the area they are trying to study (the

All time high, on what scale. This is the type of media frenzied slanted headlines that create so many “deniers” because it makes the media unbelieveable and untrustworthy. Truth is plants cant survive when PPM gets below 150PPM. Plants are starving around 300PPM. CO2 levels above 400PPM are arguably going to be

Oh please... the rate of the rise of sea level has been constant since measurements began in 1860. 2.8 mm per year. In spite of the vast increase in CO2, the rate has remained the same.

Amen...

Which ‘record’? The record of temperatures as they have been collected over about the last century, or the record of temperatures after NOAA applied ‘adjustments’ that uniformly reduce older temperatures and increase more recent ones, in the process erasing the ‘sea ice years’ of the 1960s and 1970s that almost

But it sends an important signal to the world: That the United States may finally be ready to assume a larger role when it comes to tackling climate change

So, we shouldn’t believe NASA when they say that the Antarctic Ice Sheet is gaining ice volume? http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddar…

Or how about the National Sea Ice organization where it said we are very close to the record ever Ice Coverage in Antarctica from last year?

As a young-earth creationist, let me just say I’ve already heard the rebuttals to pretty much everything you posted. You can look on some of the popular young earth creationist websites, such as Answers in Genesis, or Creation Ministries International, and find responses which were, in many cases, written years ago.

Let

Microevolution, yes. Macroevolution, no. Your article is full of misleading and inaccurate information. You conflate two different theories of evolution which is, unfortunately, a common mistake. What Darwin discovered was microevolution which he then attempted to extrapolate into a theory of macroevolution.

With evidence such as is presented in this article it’s surprising that the number of Americans who believe in creation isn’t much, much higher. This piece is a very nice example of the type of unsubstantiated conclusions and logical fallacies that are commonly given by supporters of evolution.

Is Evolution a Scientific Theory?

I don’t know what everyone else thinks, but the people who wrote the Constitution and Bill of Rights are smarter than 99.9999999999999% of the people who have ever lived.

Science hasn’t proven anyone wrong yet. We are in a historically cool period in Earth’s history, and it will warm no matter what we do. The global warming alarmists have been wrong every time they’ve made a prediction. It was global cooling and we are headed to an ice age in the 80s. Then it was global warming in the

I rank Rogue Nation 3rd best in the franchise, behind the original (of course) and Ghost Protocol, which was pretty amazing. Ilsa is the best part of the film for sure, and the dedication to practical effects is refreshing.

Just gleaned the from another site.

Observed warming has tracked the most widely used models fairly well?

No, I nailed you for being a lazy, partisan hack. Your sarcastic response could only mean you agree with my premise, because you have no factual rebuttal to offer up. The simple fact is you wanted to file a story with minimal effort on your part that would generate the maximum click-bait potential. Accuracy and

Really? The only evidence of dumb I see here is that we have a "reporter" who can't Google for shit.

The graph is based on manipulated data. Sorry, but it's all pretty much made up and what isn't is likely due to UHI. Now, the reality is our planet has been cooling for the 21st century based on the high quality satellite data.