She is though.

Ah. Flyersfanhuh?

What’s CI?

She’s not busy

No, it’s pretty obvious that we’re not, seeing as how every piece of evidence suggests that she’s lying

Why do you hate him?

You’re trolling, right?please?

So did the fact that she wasn’t raped

The fact that nobody raped her is also seriously hurting the case

By whom? Nobody knows who she is. Also, she’s a liar lol

You can’t re-victimize someone who was never actually a victim

False. No reasonable person, who has read and kept up with the details of this case, could possibly doubt Kane’s innocence by now. There is not a shred of evidence or testimony that that suggests he’s guilty

I’d like to hear some more examples of the “plenty to cast doubt” besides his dna, which was actually part of the evidence exonerating him considering the fact that none of it was found anywhere below her chest. Hard to fuck without leaving dna, no?

Someday you’ll have to explain to me how you starred your own post 3 times

You’re obnoxious

Cuz she’s an angry bitch....

Not a fan of the way he plays hockey? I can’t think of another reason why you’d support the team but not their star player

As always, Greg writes a great sports article

I’m sure somebody someday will explain to me why it was so important to end this abhorrent oppression that we needed to waste government time and money to address it

You understand that what you’re doing is the cousin to “victim blaming” and isn’t any better, right? Like you’re actively assuming someone is guilty of one crime because they’ve committed a far less egregious crime in the past. It means you’re shitty.