Like alan smithee.

Even sky high worked on the strength of the script and actors. Mike felt like a director for hire on that.

Isnt it ironic that the sequel to a film that successfully avoided the notion of a 90 minute commercial is being helmed by a director who did a 90 minute commercial for trolls products.

Mikes basically in the same category as brett ratner and shawn levy. Director for hire that has no real vision.

Also, some reports state the writer of big mommas house 3 is taking over.

Feels like if they hired brett ratner after tossing away bryan singer and matthew vaughn for x men last stand. Hes just a director for hire like brett. Not a good move at all.

Like others have said, it's not just final destination 5. He's also written thing 2011 and nightmare on elm street 2010 and none of his films are good. That's a big worry.

Great review. But what will IGN think? WIll Seth finally be impressed?

Ign just gave the episode another low score with more b.s. Can't spell ignorant with ign.

Apparently. His negatives are slow pace and avas story being "boring"

And apparently thats his most hated aspect.

All it was is seth complaining that the episode was "too slow" and that he wanted plot details to be revealed NOW not understanding the importance of character development.

Did you see the laughable 6.9 ign review and score for this episode?

Maybe the ending will be different from the one martin was planning to write.

Im guessing you wont watch the show based on them in december on netflix.

which site?

Exactly. No character development, unlikeable and undeveloped idiots, plot holes, and a final act that I felt manipulated by sums up this awful remake.

Yet mia is painfully underdeveloped and awfully acted while his brother was slme coward unlikeable idiot.

They expanded it to include levels from rio 2.

It's mean spirited in tone and may have benefitted if surly was meant to be mean and the bad guy and the raccoon be the hero.