No, you’re not the only person, you nincompoop!

What an excellent article. And what a shithole company!

This is much closer to how we speak English now than the English of certain parts of Octopath Traveler. Most of the deviations involve randomly capitalized words and some purple prose.

I’m sorry, those are the before photos. We all know that anywhere that glossy and white is about thirty minutes away from some sort of catastrophe that’ll leave it littered with dismembered bodies and force you to beat mutants to death with a pipe-wrench to escape.

“White Knight attorneys, incorporated.”

Understanding that does not change one fundamental fact: In most cases, piracy. Is. Theft.

That was some magnificent journalism. This is the sort of thing I come to Kotaku for. <3

Do not play Xenogears, it isn’t finished and the last third of the game is literally handled by filling in the missing scenes by having one of the characters sit in a deckchair and narrate at you.

Come the fuck on.

I think the headline was far more provocative and clickbait-y than her perfectly reasonable letter warranted. *shrug*

They’ve made a terrible mistake by having the system award you XP for giving people endorsements. It means that people are incentivised to always use all three of their endorsements, regardless of whether or not they’re deserved.

I never said constructions shouldn’t change or that they’re “sacrosanct”

Also forbidden by Leviticus:

I mean, you could just read the page I linked to, but:

Sure we can! We do it all the time! By your logic, we shouldn’t ever have stopped marrying girls off before they reached puberty, or given women the right to own property, or any number of other things which are now the cultural default but were once considered wildly transgressive.

Far too many people to reply to insisting that “there are only two genders” or “this is some modern fashion thing”:

Indeed. It was pleasant to talk to someone who’s actually capable of debate.

A “trans woman” can be called a woman if that is what she wants. She need not have “trans” attached. Agreed?

the simple fact of the matter is, unless you’re going to say, for example, that trans women cannot be referred to as women, then there’s a linguistic need for a word which describes “that subset of people who are women but not trans”

Your argument of “if this describes you, then this is the word for you” is an argument that is no different then the ones used by people who say gender and sex are defined by chromosomes. You either are XY or XX and thus Male or Female.