celandine---
Celandine
celandine---

From your other article about this when it was previewed back in (!) 2016:

Why so harsh on the guy?

“Liking anime is not surprising any more, but it seems like every time a new celebrity reveals their love of anime, the internet immediately gets flooded with hot takes [...]”

*grins widely*

“Fire belongs to the Gods, Prometheus! Your quest is folly!”

Jesus fucking christ, what a travesty.

Historically, “meat” actually didn’t specify “animal flesh”, and simply meant “food” or even “dish”. So anyone decrying its use to refer to non-flesh foodstuffs as “modern” should consider that people from the 9th century would say the same about them!

You and many of your friends joined the NRA because people were saying they were responsible for mass shootings?

But... why don’t you just turn it off? It doesn’t wake up from that.

Laser Lords!?

Y’know, it’s interesting to me to note that you claim you want a reasoned discussion, and yet one of the first lines in the article is:

Oh yeah, absolutely!

The alcohol content of beer is insufficient to kill bacteria. A concentration of 10% ABV or higher will temporarily inhibit bacterial growth, but it requires a >70% concentration to be an effective antibacterial agent.

Ayup, there’s no better way to win someone over to your cause than to tell them to fuck off! Hoo boy, alienating fence-sitters sure does increase the number of people who’ll vote for the policies we want, yes-sirree! Whassat you say, you don’t support everything we do wholeheartedly? GET THE FUCK OUT, FILTH, WE DON’T

So no relation to the Demi-Monde series of sci-fi works by Rod Rees?

The juxtaposition of this with the headline “There’s Something For Everyone In Amazon’s One-Day Logitech Sale” just below it on Kotaku is peak irony.

By “next year”, you mean “the year after next”, I see.

“Turns out food can have a pretty powerful affect.”

No, they’re defined for the benefit of citizens, one assumes. Citizens who would probably quite like it to be possible for that person who shot them to be found.

You don’t see how it’s advantageous to be easily able to locate the owner of a firearm if it’s used in a crime?