A twinkie wiener sandwich

Too bad it's a "concrete turd" (Jays fan's words, not mine)

But imagine the epic nights that would be had if the stadium was actually in the geographic center thus making it within eye sight of the block.

That sounds like perfectly cromulant logic for anyone coming from Georgia.

So one guy forgets his steel toed boots and decided to no show for work and drive all the way back to Maryland from Florida instead of just going to Walmart and buying a new pair of boots?

Not according to the ballot. Sergio is listed as Republican and Progressive.

The mayor ballot is weirder. The Dem is also the conservative candidate while the Repub is also the progressive candidate.

I seem to remember Gran Turismo doing this and everyone screaming hallelujah that they didn't have to redo all the license tests between two of the releases (2 and 3 maybe?)

Do alligators alligate?

You don't say...?

That's because in most cases of the runner stealing second and the ball sailing the initial contact is made during the act of trying to catch the ball. The interference here comes from the first contact occurring as the ball was already in left field and the runner was on his way towards home. The stumbling issue on…

The issue is that the part that was emphasized has no bearings on the play that occurred and can make the ruling on the field seem incorrect. The emphasized part is specifically the part that says that when a runner is going to first base there is only interference if the contact was intentional. However, whether or…

Koji should be the most angry person out there. Salty took the ball out of his hands with his stupidity.

I don't think he would have tripped over Middlebrooks' butt had his legs not been lifted in the air. He started to run, saw legs flopping around, tried to stop, and that is what caused him to tumble over Middlebrooks instead of stepping over him.

Did you actually call him a dumbass? If so, that may have had something to do with it.

There is a huge difference between 7.06 and 7.09 in that for 7.09 to be called into effect the interference must be deemed intentional, whereas in 7.06 it must only be deemed to exist. This is because 7.09 governs the runner who has the right to the baseline and is not allowed to leave the baseline to avoid a tag. By…

Basically, 7.09 is about a runner interfering with a fielder (and i is specifically about the runner going to first interfering with the catcher) , 7.06 is the rule about the fielder interfering with the runner

Rule 7.09 has nothing to do with this play as it refers to a runner going to first base interfering with the catcher, which is the opposite of what was called and exists to give catchers a fair chance at fielding a drag bunt. The rule that was enforced was 7.06

Clearly I was making a joke, but since you are so intent on defending the Rockies:

Yes, he was wearing the wrong jacket, but it was the Red Sox that made the error of calling him retired.