"'Won't Her Period Attract Bears?' The Answer May Surprise You"
"'Won't Her Period Attract Bears?' The Answer May Surprise You"
Also: maybe the difference isn't men and women but people whose work is paid well/valued v those whose work is not and who therefore need to find other forms of value in the workplace?
I think it's more the (undignified, 'click'-baity, tone-deaf) way WSJ is framing the article, which the author probably has zero control over. Look at the accompanying images: a guy scratching his head before a metaphorical representation of women that is literally a giant question mark. A huge retro photo that calls…
I work with 2 other women and we're pretty uncomplicated. It can happen.
Actually, title/image aside...it seems pretty good?
I need more GIFs wow omg.
If only journalists put as much effort attempting to prove somebody was raped as they have, here, trying to prove somebody wasn't.
You stay classy Uber... Clearly your model is... UBER PROFITABLE.
they're too big. I like Lyft because they're smaller and have better oversight.
Well, in my family, we usually only offer cocoa to people on crisp cool or cold nights during the fall / winter. I mean, we're in Texas. You don't drink that shit when it's not cold outside. Unless he lives in a meat locker. In that case he drinks that shit year ROUND to keep his ass warm.
However, I got to thinking...…
As I said to someone else, he wasn't convicted of molesting Anna Cardwell, though. He was convicted of molesting another girl. I have no doubt that he also molested Anna, but from a CYA standpoint, I can see why Mark uses "allegedly" here.
since he was convicted, you can drop the "allegedly"
The laws are state by state. There is much better protection in California. Which is why they now do all these reality shows with kids out off state. Other states don't consider reality shows work so they don't have to comply with child labor laws. And they don't have the legal protection of their earnings.
There is, but only in some states, and Georgia isn't one. It's called the Coogan law after Jackie Coogan'd parents stole his entire earnings. 15% of the child's wages are required to be withheld from the parents until they turn 18.
It's actually pretty hard to get kids removed. My mom admitted to doing some really weird shit to us as kids (like, locking us out of the house during the winter) to a social worker on a home visit and we never came close to getting taken away. She told therapists even worse stuff about being physically abusive and…
Since so many parents have stolen their kids' trust fund money (in entertainment), how is it that there are currently no better avenues of legal protection for the kids, separate from the parents? Your kid shouldn't end up broke bc you have their money to some felon.
srs question, how does she still have custody of her kid? (Kids?)
One of my favourite GIFs. Dog don't even care.
Actually, according to leading medical professionals, the best way to induce labor is to be kidnapped by a soap opera villain, taken to his secret lair and then try to make an escape on a boat that eventually starts to sink. It is guaranteed to work every single time!
This guy shitting on the floor is a very apt metaphor for why he's in the news now.