cdmccauley67
The66thDopefish
cdmccauley67

Not even Lindsay Lohan is safe from his awful mouth/mind:

... and Bounsweet seems to bellossom into womanhood before our very eyes.

Question: how should you respond if you are the executive of a successful company and your husband decides that you’re too good at your job so he divorces you? Note: your now ex-husband is the owner of said company.

Since Paul Pierce is retiring and Matthews has the number 34, can we start calling him “The New Truth”?

Now playing

Counterpoint: this is the best stop motion music video ever

No “Oskar Schindler realizing he could have saved more people”?

I’m more like to cry at this point, because I wasn’t going to vote for Hillary (Stein) but damn does everything Donald says make me want to vote for her so we can see just how low his numbers can go. If nothing else, I want this election to be a referendum and condemnation of people with Trump’s attitude and his

“Grab ‘em by the pussy” is the new “grab the bull by its horns.”

basic logic

Oh Kelly Ayotte, in your unending quest to toe the line, you are going to write in the vice presidential candidate, Mike Pence, for president, thereby making your vote count for less than if you voted for an actual presidential candidate.

I’d love to see the look on her face when she gets to the vice presidential

This campaign, particularly on the right, is rapidly devolving into “I may be bad, but here are a bunch of talking points about how Hillary (and Bill) are worse.”

This is really a non-issue. There are a finite number of Twitter handles possible, and I’m sure this Calvin Wong is not the only Calvin Wong on the planet. It’s possible it wasn’t a coincidence, but...this is like someone being butthurt that their name was in a movie that has nothing to do with them.

You probably get NH ads because a lot of New Hampshirites work in Massachusetts (like my parents). (I don’t live in NH anymore, but I know what you’re talking about.)

I was thinking about this when I was responding to OMG!PONIES!: certain outlets want to have people subscribe to them in order to access their content (see NYT, WashPo), but some cheapasses (✋) don’t want to pay for a full subscription.

Idea: Twitter and outlet can work out an a la carte pay structure, wherein people

“Most of the retooling has involved reworking what does and does work against the character limit.”

Right, I heard about that. So now links to other sites, where there is actual content, won’t count against the limit. That highlights another one of my concerns about Twitter: they create no content/media of their own,

I understand that “Twitter wasn’t made to be doing conversations,” but again I think that’s part of its shortfall. People want to use Twitter as a method to have a conversation (or, at the very least, have their voice heard) but, as Kevin Malone from The Office demonstrated (“Why use many word when few word do

I consider myself a Twitter novice, but it seems to me that a communication medium that insists on putting limits on how much communication a person can do at once is hampering its growth potential. As a means of having a conversation, it doesn’t lend itself well to that end.

My get-up and Pokemon Go got up and Pokemon Went.

Having lived in New Hampshire for nearly twenty years I’ve seen firsthand that their politicians are either feast (John Sununu) or famine (Jeanne Shaheen).

Boxing is bad for your brain? NO SHIT?!