KC is 23-8 the last 2 years in the postseason. There's no way that is a fluke. If they were a one season wonder then ok. But 23-8, without a doubt, trumps any other anylitics. Again, I’m not saying that KC is the ‘27 Yankees but they’re a damn good team. I like anyliticss but I’m not sure why a computer didn’t quess…

EXACTLY. And if KC had beat the Cubbies in the series then all of these points you're trying to make would hold a bit more water.

Please show me a year where 95 wins wouldn't have got them within shouting distance.

And the NL East was?

Ok, I’ll bite. I’m a lifelong KC fan and I even admit that there was ‘maybe’ 3-4 teams better than the Royals last year but NYM wasn’t one of them. KC was coming off of a World Series the year before, they had a better record than NYM, better run differential than NYM, in a better division than the NYM. They also…

So, are you saying the Mets should of won the series?

I remember my first beer.

Again not a taunt. Did I see where there was like 11 NFL starting QBs in the last few years that played HS ball in TX but not 1 went to UT?

Sort of, I think everybody was well aware of the network about two years before it launched. I think I remember it taking a long time for them to polish that turd.

A

Very true. Love’m or hate’m, they are the backbone of that conference.

Yep I forgot lil brother, aTm.

He may have also said it but I know I heard CR. He was talking about Strom Thurman telling the ladies to ‘let a playa play’

I swear this isn't a taunt and I don't expect you to have the answers but....... How in the hell is it possible with that recruiting base, to not be a top 10 team every year. UT doesn't recruit, they offer.

Please gawker for the love of gawd, if they start bumping fuzz, quit filming!!!!

This maybe, possibly, could be the reason that CU, UNL and Mizzou jumped at the first good option that came their way? As Chris Rock says ‘a man is only as faithful as his options’. Those three had better options and the rest of the league is still ass chapped.

I want to why it makes a shit bit of difference if it’s a guy that looks like a girl or girl that looks like a guy or a guy that looks like a guy or a girl that looks like a girl, that brings you your fourth basket of breadsticks?

If you want the completely other side of the coin, Jezebel is the third door on the left, then make another left and take the elevator on the left. Over there, every guy is guilty until proven innocent, and then they’re still guilty. Since ‘no charges’ doesn’t mean he didn’t do it. (I’ve seen that posted many times)

Unfortunately this is a case of he said she said, since they didn’t actually have sex, gawker has no video evidence.

“Psssssst....buddy, this is gawker. You’re going to get us both yelled at for liking that awesomely written classic”. And I'm from Kansas City.