I’ve had plenty of good experiences with Fords but all I see here is more stuff to break & more power to break it. This just isn’t a platform I’d trust to put that much power down. It’s got no design focus. Too much weight to really be sporty, not an off roader & too tall to get around corners.

Electronic tcase, 450hp & low profile tires.

Wow I really like the 932. Lots of great Autobahn cars look pretty simple.

I’ve been in one, they really do scream.

Seconded, the Macan was pleasantly Dakar-ish, this just steps it up.

Ok that’s every kind of wrong. Ferry DESIGNED the people’s car.

This is really good but they also need to stop telling the rest of us to pretend we’re socialites.

My twin spark (CA20E) ‘86 Nissan Stanza/Prairie wagovan could chirp its’ tires upshifting to 3rd (5 speed).

Hard spring rates are not a problem. Volvos are built to be sturdy first & next to my V50 that’s exactly what I want. Mine’s getting sport HD Konis & reinforced tower cap bearings because these things aren’t Audis, under throttle they like to turn up the nose.

Mini is making the 300HP Mini we demanded.

Interaction to stand in for much of the system however.

Cars aren’t software & software devs aren’t appliances. Of course it was the wrong fit, robotics =/= proprietary iOS apps. I need another shamelessly derivative programing language on an overpriced phone about as much as I need Prius drivers the world over suddenly commanding 700+ HP with one button.

Well it’s not an Econoline thus I feel scammed.

Bugger I thought it was a F150 SAS Raptor!

I mapped a good number of old bell X planes working @ Bing Maps. Here’s wishing I caught this.

Counterpoint; Tesla cannot computationally support this. If they could they might have gotten around to velcro & panel gaps. I’m a coder who’s looked at working in automotive firms & this debases most of those ideas completely. Software is so named for a reason, you don’t call it a query when you dig a pine cone from…

I’ve come across a couple exellent ones & that’s where I live in Colorado. They were both earlier & later V8 models if I recall...

Legendary, yeah sure OK I like these anyway but as a 2X Saab owner I acknowledge none of those other picks except the Integra. Per actual FWD capability I’d say it goes Saab/this/Integra/MkIV/Volvo 850/RSX & not much more. It’s not going to win any designer friends for me but big overhangs = torsional rigidity. For…

Well I have a V50... What’s the towing capacity of a C30/70?

I’ve heard the same. As I understand it this has less to do with any bellhousing stuff & all the more to do with clutch-assisted declutching as well as ratio stack. Thus I’m pretty sure these figures refer to gen.2 3.2 R32s.