He's a genuine person who was pretty instrumental in kicking off the geek revolution of the '00s through his unabashed, unembarrassed love for D&D/geekery.

As a nerd growing up in the '90s and early '00s, Vin Diesel has always had a certain "you can be both cool and a total geek" vibe. His unabashed love for Roleplaying games (D&D) and reported "really, actually a nice down-to-earth guy" made him the action star that I (and my friends) had no guilt enjoying.

You're correct. There's a huge difference between noting that the owners treat their staff poorly and harass them. That seems to be 100% fine under the policy.

Immature artists imitate. Mature artists steal.

"Reasonable" is what the FBI decided was not the case.

Yes, the concept you're looking for is enshrined as "Clear and present danger" and has a long legal precedent.

Because it simply reveals that you care not for liberty nor justice, but about retribution and vengeance.

It is jaded and cynical, but when a public figure goes so far down the "activist" hole so quickly all I can see are market demographics and projected earnings.

He's done a few: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2014/07/…

China is to Communism what Spam is to beef.

As someone who went to high school with Evans and knew his family (his brother and I acted in school players together frequently and his mother/sister have both been high school theater instructors), this is just him. He's a really good guy. Can't speak for Pratt, but it wouldn't surprise me if this were just the two…

The original Fable was really quite something. Not as groundbreaking as other titles, but booting it up on my old Xbox via CRT led me into the kind of world we had never really had with so much polish.

When is the internet ever not using the "Jump to Conclusions" mat?

Except that of all parties involved, Azubu has the least credible claim to "own" anything.

It's about a company (Azubu) issuing a false DMCA claim for content they didn't even own.

All I'm saying is that in a court of public opinion, specifically campaigning for a school to enact discipline on others requires those campaigning to accept discipline taken against their own selves for the campaign.

They're whipping themselves into a place where no matter how right they are, they're coming off as stubborn and childish for not taking responsibility for their very disruptive actions.

Tempstorm/Reynad tends to be a lightning rod for controversy. At the end of the day, they're generally a bunch of teenagers being teenagers— only now under a huge spotlight. So much drama from that community.

It's a shame we'll never see this round of "objects thrown through the screen while playing".

Does that mean that men are being disproportionately targeted in general shootings? Should be do something about that?