Because I'm not a singular bit of prose?

Wow. you assume that it's all women-in-the-butt specific. That just reinforces my initial position.

But this isn't a novel nor is it presented as fictional.

But you won't give to the same to, say Bill O'Riley? I wouldn't either, but I see them both as what they are: money-makers which need to excite their audience.

So you're cool with lying and distorting actual events for your political "win"?

Yep. And setting it as an eternal "oops" does exactly zero favors to anyone. Let us kill that meme quick, as I haven't seen it since I aged out of the "I'm 15!" bracket.

It's manufactured. 100%. It isn't real nor is it even close to a real issue.

No, it wouldn't have. But reinforcing traditionally gender norms and roles isn't exactly what we're hoping for. Frankly, I feel bad for the men who even try since we're cementing the "Female Purity" bullshit.

This is positive?

You bring up a lot of fixed points. You lack an understanding that regardless of the constants (like race or sexuality or whathaveyou) you're staring at a purely economic, class-based problem. We're trying to solve economic issues by saying they aren't economic and then throwing money at rich people to solve the…

It doesn't make sense, but it also makes me sad that we have to rely on tired and incorrect scripts. Not much has really changed, outward socially, about "takin' it in the butt" but we're better than this as a society.

Hippie? Nah, this is Post-Left Anarchist.

Seriously. My wife geeks out over stuff and our individual-but-appreciated geeking out is a big part of why we're, you know, happy together.

You know what would be amazing and transgressive? If they did an episode about buttsex that wasn't all "eww, OMG women are pure!!!11!".

I'm saying that we should be more and more concerned, now, with the use of WL-as-selling-point then we have been in the past. A serious movement gets degraded into a marketing scheme quickly and even with the best of intent. This segment was nothing more than pandering to a conflict and miming the sort of ritualistic…

I just say we embrace our puritan nature and admit that we think that sex outside of our own comfort zone is icky. Way less baggage when we're all up-front.

Here's a real question: What is the definition of "should"? What sense of entitlement does that lead to? What sense of entitlement are we fighting against?

Not for long, seeing as how that went! /playingalongwiththeconceit

Wow. Say what you will, but this is Women's Liberation wrapped up nicely in a bow for sale to the general public. When your social movement becomes the impetus-but-not-butt of such jokes you know that Capitalism has begun to work on their co-opt. Women's Liberation is being packaged and sold back to us by a program…

I dunno. I'm leaning toward rooting for the DJ here. I can't see any way whatsoever this is a gender issue. Seems the sisters took an opportunity to freeze him out... which is sadly common in the world of music.