Not if she says it isn't, which is the issue. Never legislate subjectives.

Like how "Stop 'n Frisk" is a small price to pay to keep drugs off our streets?

To the point, if it is or is not rape would be 100% subjective with 100% of the power to make such a call in the hands of one party.

Wow. That's sexual assault. Especially in California school systems.

Wait. I can go to Columbia for the purpose of fucking with rent-a-cops and get a good laugh at the same time?

Exactly. This is the problem. Change this and you change everything.

Because they pay tuition and are often from families where investment in the student is better than investment in morality. It is in the school's vested interest to side with the wealthier or the better earning-potentialed than with anything moral or ethical.

So, legally, the only instance (within the US) of this with an acquittal I can find is a single case from 1989. Are there more? Any more recent than two decades?

Actually, all it takes is one issue to create a landslide and force the re-evaluation of policy top-down from a 21st century perspective.

I think people on both extremes are rather off-point in assuming that having things one way or another will be some huge difference. This is, overall, a good idea.

There's good reason for the strangely empty story. Something happened about a year before launch to totally revise the story and give us what we have now instead of something closer to the narratives we've seen in other Bungie games.

Karma doesn't work that way.

Women "in the home" (who take a domestic role by choice as I see nothing indicating otherwise) who generally take the more "submissive" approach and who fit that idea... well, I'm not exactly too much in disagreement that many women who end up as caregivers and homemakers end up in a bad place by their relinquishment…

Haven't really played since 3.0 (4.0 demo game was a joke) but 5th edition has me very, very, very excited. Like if the free-form coolness of 2nd ed smashed into the streamlined (for the time) 3rd ed you'd have 5th in the smoldering wreckage.

Wait. Compelled to divulge private sexual details to a third party? How is that legal/ethical/okay, or did I miss something?

What makes her "conservative" in this view is that she discusses the issue with statistics and non-partisan approaches. She rejects the social framework of theory-over-evidence and tries to avoid doing anything but engaging with evidence before her.

This is Trans erasure. Why isn't every couple trans? Totes more realistic.

Recommended by a civil person? Uh no way. BTW Jordan can grab whatever he wants. As if white dudes realized their problem?

Jordan strikes me as a "slap the ass" man. Like, everyone gets SLAPPED ASSES! SLAPPED ASSES FOR ALL!

Dude is happy he has grabbed asses. Women he grabbed less enthusiastic.