I can type slower if it helps...if they were ONLY successful because of cheating then what is the excuse for losing two close SBs and not even making the playoffs once if they had an unfair advantage?!
I can type slower if it helps...if they were ONLY successful because of cheating then what is the excuse for losing two close SBs and not even making the playoffs once if they had an unfair advantage?!
They’re not, it’s because you have reading comprehension issues, tubby.
A) nope, simply made factual statements and then backed them up with stats and links.
Which facts dipshit? The facts that is wasn’t and STILL isn’t illegal to film? Or the fact that both Goodell and a judge stated they had zero evidence against Brady? Pick either and you’ll still be wrong, cuckboy.
Our “slow white receivers” are part of the top 2 offense in thge NFL bumfuckewr. And last I checked you don’t speak for everyone.
Yup, Gronk is considered fast for his size, and both Edelman and Welker could run fast routes and gain good yardage after the pass. My only point was to refute the “slow, white” comment which is absurd at best.
Fuckhead, my original statement included YAC (yards after the catch) to prove the point, if you’re fucking slow you would have an atrocius YAC line....dumbass. Secondly, Jerry Rice was 6'2" putting him a good FIVE INCHES taller than both Welker and Edelman!
You’re not following, the poster above stated that the ONLY reason they were successful during the Spygate era (2001-2007) was because of cheating, which my above statement completely refutes.
Somewhat, but their YACs are impressive which means they are also running vertical after the catch.
You can easily be that height and weight at 5% body fat, there are many pro body builders at that size.
...not when he doesn’t go out and drink socially, no.
Why don’t you and thoac take your bullshit agenda back over to Jezebel and let the adults converse?
No dumbass, it states “...Two weeks later, Masina and the victim were partying in Utah, when she passed out.” Per the TMZ link in THIS ARTICLE: “...after another day of boozing and marijuana use with Masina.”
Because we refute weak statements with actual facts and links supporting them? We’ll enjoy are continued successful franchises, you can continue to wallow in the misery that is yours.
Exactly, you say how little anyone cared when the Jets and Falcons were caught. yet ask them why they lost two close SBs and it becomes “well, they didn’t cheat hard enough”!
...Edelman hasn’t had a concussion since he started playing in the NFL, in the SB he was tested and cleared.
...and yet they always get open in man-to-man coverage and were in the top ten for receiving when healthy. If they’re not fast why would they have so many receiving TDs between them, considering two of them are considered small in this league?
This guy is just plain batshit, and lacks any sense of comprehension to facts.
What’s to challenge? I just showed you tons of stats disproving Spygate as having any relevance or advantage when it came to winning games you dumb fuck! That article I posted can’t even be refuted by you, and yet here you are asking me to challenge an article from ESPN of all places, that was ridiculed nationally…
Name one the...exactly.