The problem is "aggressor" is irrelevant. The officer broke the law by obstructing traffic in an overtaking lane, then participated in road rage.

It is logical to use a less safe, less efficient method of transport that could never have never been built for a justifiable price? I'm sure you have aligned yourself with anything that is opposition to whatever the great "evil" is in your mind (most likely automobiles) without actually analyzing the situation.…

Portland, OR is a good example, but I have seen it in many places. Typically places where people would like to act before thinking about what would really be an optimal solution. It seems to somewhat correlate to the density of Prius drivers. Rather than analyze the efficiency and cost of systems over time, they do…

Ignorantly decreasing the efficiency of existing systems based on illogical moral grounds is obviously a better choice. How could we be so blind?

What about cities that added over priced and terrible light rail, nearly ran themselves broke, and can't afford to properly secure or maintain them so the majority of use they get are criminals and hippies? Oh yes, and in order to make them fit, reduced/doubled up the use of roads for these slow moving transportation…

No, the price is decent. You certainly couldn't build another for the same price, but I'm not sure I want to. If it had been an older AE86 it would be a lot more appealing being Right Wheel Drive....

Trans Am's are one of those cars you really have to have a mullet to drive.

Blue S30 win.

I honestly expected him to run a couple of them over after they got out of the cars. He must practice his breathing exercises like a boss. After about the second time of dealing with one of those people I think I would be arrested.

I loved my Z32 and it was built extremely well. They look a little more dated than say an FD3, but they are still a world class car.

I thought the same thing, but the MKIII really was out classed by the other options and was more or less over shadowed by the MR2 Turbo as Toyota's offering. Remember, the MKIII Turbo only had slightly more power than the non-turbo Z32 300ZX and weighed over 3200lbs. The MR2 showed up and with 200HP and weighed only…

That doesn't look like keys to me. It looks like someone swung something into it (on a cart or vehicle) and then reversed direction. If you had been at a Home Depot I would honestly say someone probably hit you with the end of a cart of 2x4's.

The title is "unintuitive features", not "features that are odd". If you didn't tell someone how to open the door, would basic logic and intuition get them to the answer in a short amount of time? Probably not, unless they are use to old hot rods with shaved handles.

How is this different than how the little old ladies and hippies that normally own these vehicles already drive? Are they sure it was the vehicle and the drivers simply weren't resting their left foot on the brake while driving and them depressing it when startled? People driving vehicles like this are only marginally…

They have, but companies still get it wrong. So long as they keep up the roll they have going with their awesome new ecoboost motors it will probably be good, but if they keep it cheap it could be a repeat. They need to take a page from Nissan's book and over engineer their turbo motors so they not only get a good…

Nah, even the boosted 4 they offered was garbage. You had to change the turbo nearly as often as you had to change the oil due to the defective oil system and poor mounting bolts... but that was coming up on 30 years ago, so they have a lot better grasp of things this time around.

The problem isn't horse power, the problem is ability in general. I think rather than power, it should be by speed. For instance a basic license lets you drive around town up to 45 MPH, the next level lets you take rural roads <60 MPH, the next is basically freeway and up to the maximum 80 MPH. Then there should be…

Does no one remember that they have done this before in the 80's and it turned out awful Maybe this will be their change to redeem themselves... or relive terrible past experiences and tarnish the brand for another 10 years.

Wouldn't that imply that everyone acknowledged it was Women's Day? I know I don't. Special acknowledgement is not equality and as such, it should not be standardly recognized any more than discrimination should be. You are not recognizing someone for their efforts or role, you are recognizing them based on gender,…

Sexual objectification is not inherently sexist. Just throwing the word "sexism" around does not actually imply a relation. You need to apply logic to your argument before simply vomiting back up lines from your intro to women's studies course you took. If you compare the level of empowerment offered to these woman vs…