caseyp121212
Caseyp121212
caseyp121212

Have you reached out to the police department for comment? There are a lot of broad, sweeping generalizations made here about their motives. Sure, it may be propaganda, but NPR did an interview with the department and asked them questions on their reasoning. The primary reasoning was that there is a drug epidemic in

Journalists are funny, always acting like they stand for something while many of them are tweaking quotes, or making up sources, or taking quotes out of context, or putting forth editorials as if they’re investigative journalism, or rushing stories because of deadlines without giving enough time to the people maligned

You’re such a pud. “Why should we trust you Univision? Gawker ppl are angry you bought us.”

Why can’t the employees of Gawker Media understand that Univision bought the assets of the company and not the liabilities? It doesn’t matter if the stories are true; they are currently in some form of actual litigation rather than just existing under the threat of litigation. Therefore, if Univision, or Ziff-Davis or

But since Gawker was put out of business, much to my dismay, isn’t Univision’s caution warranted? The prudent course would seem to see how future litigation and appeals proceed. I think taking a defensive step back at this moment is the wise choice. I realize and appreciate that Gawker’s appeal is in its

Yup, Jezebel writers pissed they can no longer write articles intentionally starting defamatory unsubstantiated rumors about other bloggers for questioning stories like the Rolling Stone rape story when their own writers defended UVA Jackie.

This has nothing to do with the First Amendment.

Remember, Hulk’s story was true, it just wansn’t news (at least according to 12 jurors in Florida). As for the deleted sites, they may/may not be true and/or news stories, as they were unverified reports.

No. What they do is muckraking.

“Journalists” is a little strong, wouldn’t you say?

“journalists.” Hilarious.

They had to have seen this coming. Those posts are what bankrupted the former gawker media group. What was the definition of insanity again?

Temper tantrum post?

In Civil Service jobs I’ve seen different. They know someone grossly overqualified might take the entry level position (& pay) simply to supplement their retirement.

You go on a killing spree, you don’t get the liberty of non-lethal force. Simple as that in my mind. If you held up a convenient store with a gun, and were in there and no one was hurt? Sure, let’s talk, I’ll send in pizza and a handheld so we can discuss your non-lethal surrender. You post up in a sniper nest, kill

You’re way off if you think the difference between what Chicago offered and what Miami offered is equal after income tax is factored in. Granted there is no income tax in Florida; however, professional athletes have to pay the state income tax for salary made while playing on the road in each state. Couple that with

Barry unfortunately you are missing a huge portion of this story ignoring the fact that Bosh, LeBron, and Wade all have the same agent. Thus, when Bosh essentially leveraged the Heat to pay him the max to keep him from going to Houston, the agent got his money at the expense of Wade getting his. When Wade opted out of

I hope that as we go along as a human race we realize that there is room for both and they can both co-exist or possibly reflect two sides of a very mysterious coin.

If you’re a federal employee, especially on the GS scale, this does not apply to you. Which is sad =/

A large percentage of people believe God created life on earth. A large percentage of people believe life just happened randomly, starting with a single cell organism and evolved over billions of years. Both groups are passionate about their beliefs. Neither can be proved or disproved. Why is one group