I only realized it was Call of Duty when the logo was shoved onto the screen at the end. I had literally forgotten that game existed and the trailer made no effort to make a connection with CoD until the logo at the end.

So true I watched the Sony E3 and didn’t see any name on the trailer until the end. I thought it looked interesting. I think they purposely set it up like that to prove a point. You can’t judge a book by its cover. I give up on Cod years ago but I might give the campaign a go. I can’t go back to the cluster fuck…

Agreed, felt the complete opposite from the battlefield 1 gameplay reveal. Just the same shit, slightly better graphics. Never thought I’d want to play a COD game over battlefield.

Just want to second this. I wish they sold the single-player seperately from the multiplayer. I just want the campaign.

So what’s the current status on Rockstar? Before E3 there was a lot of buzz that they’d have a huge event or something. I mean, I thought the entire point of this E3 was to announce a new Red Dead game?

My guess? They tried the F2P train with Heroes of the Storm, and while they’ve honestly been pumping content into that game, new heroes on the reg, and fairly consistent new maps, with balance updates all the while, but there has been no ‘phenomenon’ with HOTS, even though it’s basically the Super Smash Bros. MOBA of…

Agreed. Between the 20hz scan rate of the servers and the massive dearth of content, I feel like, at least for now, I played all that Overwatch had to offer.

This was my experience as well, the game is there and it functions. But other than the characters its just another shooter with some here and there modes. The game is fun, but was only fun for me for a weekend. I really hope others continue to enjoy it though, pretty neat little world blizzard has made once again.

I agree. The variety in quests is a new standard that I hope other games follow. Some are really quick and quirky, and others are really long, with a lot of steps and an interesting and satisfying conclusion. I sometimes wish the rewards had been better though. I felt like it was kind of rare to get something really…

“If you thought Star Wars Battlefront was insubstantial, you’re not alone. The folks running EA agree” and yet that still didn’t stop them from stretching less than a $60 games worth of content across a $60 game and a $50 season pass, and now we’re going to blame a movie release schedule for that decision?

Lack of a…

No clue if you’re being sarcastic or not, bit I totally do this. The number of people at this level has to be really low, maybe less than the number of people who cheat.

He’s getting at a bigger point: how are you supposed to know someone’s cheating? The whole point of such things is to make it look like you aren't.

Don’t forget your lightsaber:

The city mission that had you going from rooftop to rooftop? Such a good one.

And then people will make fake gamer girls with busty attributes to get more views. I will be disappointed if it is not part of the game.

When I played it for the first I pretty much felt the same way. I always wondered why they just didn’t gate off both teams and leave a no man’s land in the middle.

The game actually provided feels. This is remarkable and hard to do, especially when this was a game with a silent main character and a team that you only just met. Thinking back on it, Reach and ODST were the best games in the Halo series, even if they were not the best Halo games, if that makes sense. They don’t…

yeah its pretty easy to do. You can drop a level 2 turret in a very cheap spot on route 66, and as long as you have some decent team work . there’s a good chance the attackers will get trapped.

We need a good console submarine game.

I agree. It was hella fun but that ends after a few games. No leveling and all rewards are from loot boxes. So i get a bunch of stuff for characters i don’t even use. I cant see spending 60$ on this.