Is it also bad that owners might get trapped in their cars and die, too? I would think killing the customer base is bad for business.
Is it also bad that owners might get trapped in their cars and die, too? I would think killing the customer base is bad for business.
In America, they did only leases. It can not be a flop if Lexus did not want to sell them in the first place.
Buy one, David! There is a good chance you can score something for $250!
That POS is what brought on the guy’s heart attack.
I would think the closest thing to a mid engine Camry was the Previa.
The rural red counties get just as much say as the blue cities.
Because only Russians are crazy enough to actually pull off such an idea by launching a missile out of a gun.
$7.5K gets you a much newer Rav4.
Population =/ common interests.
Remember Teslas have Sentry mode and will record everything you do to the car.
The CA standard is in a way similar to Microsoft’s OS monopoly in the 1990's. They hold overwhelming market share so what they dictate can be interpreted as the defacto standard. Making multiple standards of a product becomes expensive.
Go big or go broke. Just ask for the sky and then some. Reality be damned.
There is a good point to make that populous states should not have such sway like California. While emissions regulation is one that is beneficial, others like water rights is not. Do we want California to forcibly take away the water rights of the Colorado river from other states in any negotiations?
I would judge states’ actions by their merits. California does many things right and does just as many things wrong.
Any dumbass could see Chariot was a money loser. What was Ford’s execs thinking? I guess it makes sense if none of them read up on how public transportation is almost always a money losing proposition.
But is the beer to die for?
Even Ford TC’s are $10k for the last gen model.
“But sir, we are not David Tracy.”
But the health care costs for continuous tetanus exposure offsets the low purchase price.