Wrong. It’s not about CHOOSING to kill 30 people, it’s about not choosing to kill the operator of a vehicle because the system (a computerized car) will NEVER have enough information to decide between the known (a car full of protected people) and the possible victims outside the car.

Baloney. It’s not a driver’s responsibility to pass at a speed DETERMINED by drivers BEHIND them. Ever.

Except your “passing only” rule doesn’t exist in reality for the mega-speeders. They NEVER pass and then get back into the “non-passing” lanes. They simply dive into the passing lane, and then travel faster and faster (pretty much unlimited, getting up to 85-90 mph with no concerns) until they encounter a slower car…

Nope, because it isn’t the PRINTER that is the major obstacle.

No, first of all that’s a horrible ethical decision that would also be killing loads of fantastic individual citizens for the sake of saving the most bodies, which simply isn’t a tenant of any law or social contract that we humans construct. We value the individual and their individual life as far as possible until it…

This “problem” has already been mostly solved over decades of roadway and automotive engineering, and is a very, very minor part of the issue of AI driven vehicles. The actual numbers for example are around 4500 or so pedestrian deaths from automotive collisions each year in the U.S. That’s a tiny amount of mayhem in…

Simple answer, the Thrustmaster Hotas line.