That’s odd. My brother and I are in a “family” for Prime (we actually do live together so its legit) and I don’t see his payment methods.
That’s odd. My brother and I are in a “family” for Prime (we actually do live together so its legit) and I don’t see his payment methods.
I won’t excuse its presence but the save corruption bug tended to be related to save size. Unless you acted like a true loot-goblin, (unfortunately, this is often me) it was hard to hit that limit on console. I got close on PC and just stopped playing until there was a fix.
dBrand with those replacement plates you mentioned was a sponsor of this project.
The funny thing is that the current UK government has expressed interest in allowing imperial units to be used as the only units for products in stores again. (Most people think that they’re just trotting it out to appease their conservative base because of a few current scandals though.)
I wouldn’t say never here. A right to repair bill just passed in New York. If they get more traction, we may start seeing easier to fix electronics.
If the seat is being paid for, why do the airlines care if there’s a person in it? Also, if paying for an extra flight is cheaper than paying for just the first one, that feels like a business model failure.
more vitamin C than you need just leads to expensive urine
Firstly, that gives Congress the option to create copyright law it doesn’t force them to do so. Secondly, the Constitution was ratified in 1789, thirteen years after the United States declared independence. So, the Constitution has only been in force for about 99.5% of the countries existence.
Since this is over a state route, it’s on the state to repair it, not the city.
There have been a few things but a recent reminder was when I was reading some posts on Reddit and saw one by a woman asking about her husband’s midlife crisis. I was laughing until I saw that they were both 37...and remembered that I too am 37. That wasn’t so much an “I’m an adult” moment as it was an “I’m awfully…
While I agree that this is a valid target, I don’t want my hands anywhere near the toothy mouth of an angry mammal and, in order to get to the neck, I have to pass the mouth.
I feel that this is an appropriate response for any creature that decides to attack me. There’s a reason that violence in self-defense is allowed even when considering human-on-human violence.
As Desfar pointed out, as we move further into more immersive games (think VR here) this line will get blurred. We’ll get to the point soon (and in some games we may already be there) where a person can be literally looking into your characters eyes (which line up with your own POV) and seeing your character naked. It…
Just make sure that you know your local laws before doing this. In some places this type of fire requires a permit or is just plain illegal. It’s illegal where I grew up but isn’t where I live now (only about a dozen miles away). So, YMMV.
Same here! I used to be a LastPass user but, although I didn’t have any issues with them, I didn’t like the way they seemed to be going and decided to jump ship a few years ago.
I live in Michigan and didn’t get my license until I was 23. I'm 37 and I still haven’t ever driven a stick. This isn't exactly impossible.
Bitwarden has a passphrase generator that deals with those rules quite well. Here’s one that I just generated: Property-Helper-Deity3
I mention this on nearly every REAL ID article I come across but, whoever decided that putting little gold stars on required identity documents was a good idea seems to have missed a major part of 20th century history.
The problem with the trademark claim is that, unless the cheat makers were claiming (or were causing confusion to the effect) that Bungie approved or supported their cheats, I don’t know if that claim will stick either. I don’t think that even your proverbial, “moron in a hurry” would think that external cheat…
Double Jeopardy only applies in criminal cases and there is a mechanism for judges to dismiss a case without allowing it to be brought again, it’s called a dismissal with prejudice. It’s only used when a claim is thought (by the judge) to be so thoroughly broken that it can’t be solved by bringing forward more…