Bummer. wolrah did such a great job answering you, I don’t have much to add.

I give them credit for using the cars—as if keeping them in heated garages under covers and only taking them out for short cruises on sunny weekends is so “manly”.

Nah, I mean there is the chance the female passenger was indeed just that and had nothing to do with why the driver chose to run. But in the end I’m with you, that poor F/A-18.

I’m in for the passenger as well. I don’t think you can automatically assume that passengers killed by drivers would have been cool with the driving decisions being made at the time they were killed, or that were-they-in-the-driver’s-seat, that they would have made those same, ultimately fatal, decisions.

I’m worried about the Jeep.

Is it wrong that I care only about the F/A-18?

MY STANCE ON THIS:

That’s not a Chevy Colorado. It’s a Ram.

There are people probably diddling themselves to you thinking of them diddling themselves.

When you stop and think about it, there are people out there diddling to just about everything. This is why I don’t think about it.

How many gallons per mile does it get?

Spoken like a person who is not a minority.

Except that if you call the police they don’t come.

I’m no expert, but it looks like she may need three helmets.

Headline? No.

It makes me sad we’re probably in the same political party

It was a militant camp, not a village. And by potentially killing a few civilians, you potentially spared a few hundred from dying by suicide bomb.

This is a fantastic observation.

Why is it that the interior of every private plane, no matter how expensive, ends up looking like a 1985 Starcraft van conversion?

Everyone knows slave labor is pretty bad. What this comment presupposes is... maybe it isn't.