I’m going to guess the esteemed astrophysicist gets together with the lighthouse owner. She’s an aloof space cadet who wears glasses and has her hair in a perpetual bun; he’s a down-to-Earth guy with a closet full of sweaters who sees the Sears model underneath the glasses and bun.

Brand supporters are no different than supporters of Hillary Clinton (Jezebel and their fanbase)

If small talk about soda challenges and showing up six hours after being called is the “highest degree of concern” well, perhaps Columbus cops need to go back to the academy.

That sounds interesting, I’ll check it out!

You don’t think it’s malicious to show pictures of the girl from high school (presumably without her permission) that turned you down to a massive group of strangers, and then lie and say she actually accepted, but her parents were racist?

I wasn’t aware of that, but, based on the way you’re describing it, I don’t think that counts as “his own own show” you know? I’m talking about something that would center Roy and his style.

The only thing you mentioned that resonates with me is the doxxing issue. But even then it does not appear to have been intentional or malicious; at worst it was negligent, in that he took inadequate precautions to conceal her identity. I don't think that necessarily makes him irresponsible or untrustworthy.

So he takes liberties with his one-man comedy show, which he does not hold out to the public as journalism or necessarily accurate. Separately, the work he holds out as journalistic/documentary endeavors are thoroughly researched and fact-checked, thoughtful, and have won Peabody awards.

Roy def needs his own show.

I would 100% drag her for her public behavior given that she acts like drag shows are lewd, corrupting influences. But this other guy is not a public person, isn’t a politician, doesn’t make policy, and probably votes substantially like I do. If he wants to bang Lauren Boebert in secret, I think it's a not-great idea,…

I understand the retributive rationale for trying to hurt the date’s business, but I don’t agree with it. As far as I’m concerned, the only thing he did wrong here was exhibit astoundingly poor theater behavior etiquette.

I can see it. First, I have no idea what the Cool Kids’ slam book says about Boebert’s appears, but I personally find her physically attractive; moreover, she’s clearly quite *spirited* (particularly on her way out of a divorce with a dude she’s been with since before graduating high school.) Moreover, if this guy has…

Keep the doctor, keep the kid (i.e., pregnant 16 year-old, who I only count as one person,) the cop is hard “no” (not by dint of being a cop, but because this cop in particular is known to be dangerous,) the alcoholic is a hard “no”—everyone else can draw lots, myself included.

I think it’s his particular spin on the characters, inclusive of Fabletown and the specific events of the comic series, that he intends to put in the public domain.

I enjoyed Fables, though I feel it dropped off in quality around the 120's or so. Also enjoyed all the spinoffs series. The James Jean covers are, as far as I’m concerned, totally unassailable.

I’d like to believe that the potential payout from Jones’ actual assets would so large that it’s enough of an incentive for attorneys to continue hunting for it for years to come—or even in perpetuity if necessary.

Tan France seems like a person who is impossible to dislike. 

“But there are no facts in their statement.”

Yes. It seems like Collins’ complaint is that they stole her “vibe” or something.

OP explained what they meant by “IP can’t be stolen”, they’re clearly referring to this very particular set of facts and circumstances, not making an overall declaration as to IP law.