The album seems to be doing pretty good business. Someone is buying and/or streaming this music.

Holy shit, this. All of those shows on TLC (or Bravo? whichever one of those low-budget, basic cable channels had these shows,) seriously gave me the fuckin’ creeps.

Agreed completely--this is was a lot of hot air. I’m a Liz Warren fan most days of the week. Not today.

So, by your logic, if someone is ineffective once... they will always be ineffective? I disagree.

And that would be a compelling argument if this committee has any teeth, or accomplishments to date. Thus far they’ve simply illustrated how easy it is to ignore them entirely.

The fact that a ‘reasonable explanation’ requires us to assume that Democrats are playing 4D chess in order for it to not seem meek tells me that they are simply being meek.

I would certainly forgive someone for mixing up Kardashians/Jenners. 

You’re free to do what you like, but I’m not about to tell someone else what standards they may or may not have—and people generally do have a sense for “their league” (i.e., the strata of the dating pool in which they would be considered “competitive”) regardless of whether it’s based on how physically attractive…

“Are you DTF with EVERY single available option in the gender pool you’re sexually attracted to?”

I’m going to assume that “value of assets and holdings/companies” is the basis for Forbes’ declaration of Kardashian’s billionaire status. Having said that, if it’s good enough for Forbes, and everyone else reporting on Forbes second-hand, I’m going to say your position here is a “hot take”, and that the woman is a…

I’m probably a little less old than you—80's stuff generally does very little for me (though I recognize and respect the greatness, pioneers, etc.,) but 90's stuff, and even early- to mid-00's, are my jam.

I Googled “is Kim kardashian actually a billionaire” and independently looked at Snopes. I went through the second and third page of Google results, and didn’t find anything that looked like it was disputing her billionaire status circa 2021-2022 (when Forbes originally reported she had broken through.) Similarly,…

I’m surprised there’s no enhancement for the attack having been socio-politically motivated.

Unless Democrats can parlay this support into making as many (or more) single-issue-SCOTUS voters as the Republicans have, this will be completely meaningless. Donald Trump’s bid for national office was greatly enhanced by the fact that he could win over certain hardcore conservative Republican groups (despite his…

Apparently, talent isn’t necessary to be a successful white rapper[.]

But was Collins really duped—or did she simply choose not to care about the pregnant people, and particularly poor, pregnant people of color, who would be utterly screwed over by Kavanaugh’s confirmation?

Thanks for the heads up. Given my understanding of pansexuality, I’m no longer sure what she meant by “you’re not my type” (cause, isn’t a pansexual’s “type” just humans?)

She’s with MGK.

Take it up with Forbes and USA Today:

The quote derides Megan Fox for refusing to give Kim’s number to Pete; the basis for the derision appears to be that Megan Fox lacks standing to declare anyone ‘out of Pete’s league’, presumably because she herself has lowered or debased herself by being with MGK. In other words, Megan Fox’s refusal to provide Pete…