Are you saying that there’s a conceivable (albeit outside) set of circumstances under which you do not vote for the Democratic candidate in the general election? Even in spite of the fact that we’re now at juncture in which Trump appointees to SCOTUS could fundamentally change the law governing reproductive rights—and…

I can let this go and criticize him for plenty of other reasons, that’s fine.

I’ve lived in Miami for most of my life, and I think most people who follow local news here would agree that District 1 (i.e., Miami Gardens) is one of the hardest hit by gun violence in the county.

It’s 100% lazy writing—but thoughtfully discussing TV shows about magic ice zombie and dragons is far enough outside the site’s stated wheelhouse that no one who comes to Jez for what Jez typically does is going to care that they’re phoning it in with these kinds of shitpost articles.

Looooove this take!

The last time Southern states decided to ignore the inherent humanity of a marginalized group of people, they ended up losing a war over it (before attempting to rebrand it “state’s rights”).

That’s a silly thing to say about any Democrat contending for the nomination. I can’t be alone in saying that I’m eager to vote for whomever has the (D) next to their name come November 2020—regardless of whether that’s Bill De Blasio, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Pete Buttigieg, Tulsi…

Should have known from the headline what this article was going to be. Shame on me.

If Donal Trump has proven that a person can be POTUS without being remotely qualified, experienced, in touch with reality, or even really wanting the job in the first place.

The wife and I are paying down medical school and law school debt respectively. I’m going to take this as a guide to increasing disposal income for now, since “net worth” is going to be crazy negative until we deal with our liabilities.

three- to ten-year prison term

Unless of course it’s a crime for a pregnant woman to get an abortion, in which case I can definitely see the authorities zealously prosecuting black women for controlling their own reproduction.

There are only so many men that it could have been. You take every man who has had access or contact with her in the past nine months, you take some hair from each one, and you run this shit double-blind (to fairly protect the privacy of the guards who potentially didn’t do anything wrong in connection with this…

For many people,

Fears that Sullivan’s role as dean (or whatever he was at this house) would lead to the creation of an unsafe environment by operation of his representation of Weinstein are childish and irrational. Harvard has basically demonstrated what all of us probably already know: higher education—but particularly higher…

I have a friend who worked as public defender and sometimes defended people accused (and sometimes found guilty) of child sex crimes. I find it hard to believe that by dint of that representation, it would be reasonable for a parent to feel unsafe leaving their child with her.

It all looks pretty pretextual. Based on all the reporting I can find on this matter, Sullivan only really came under scrutiny when he announced his represent Weinstein.

I’m surprised with the number of seemingly black Twitter users saying it looks good except for the name. I don’t think you need a critical theory degree, or think too hard about the movie, to see that it is demeaning. I mean, it’s just plain super racist on its face.

The only two Dems really pushing concrete policies are Warren and Harris, and they’re polling in the single-digits along with Buttigieg. Mind you, I like concrete policies, but that is very not what wins elections given how well Biden and Bernie are polling.

Imagine, for example, the difference in people’s lives had Hillary won and appointed two liberal (or even moderate) supreme court justices