Noone Noone will be VCing or funding a bunch of guys in two years. Women or bust.
Noone Noone will be VCing or funding a bunch of guys in two years. Women or bust.
Sure, I guess. I’m not exactly down with putting people in cages or behind bars unless they’ve done something sufficiently bad that we reasonably need to restrain those people so they don’t do whatever again... but insofar as those child concentration camps/buildings will just be vacant, it makes fine sense to shelter…
Forcefully relocating people is such a terrible and horrible idea, I don’t know I can think of any reasonably likely scenario in which it would okay. I don’t care if there’s a hurricane of apocalyptic proportions coming—if someone doesn’t wanna go somewhere, don’t make them.
That would require that he make it to 27.
Why are we assuming that Musk’s tweet is a commitment to fixing the underlying socio-political problems that allowed for this infrastructure problem to happen, rather than a commitment to fix this very specific problem of the water in Flint hurting people?
What is with the jabs at exotic dancers in this piece? Are sex workers not allowed to decide what they want to be called?
Substantively, point well-taken; the industry talks out of both sides of its mouth (in quite a bad way) when it casts cis people to play trans roles but not the other way around. What’s more, you’d think ScarJo and her management team would have learned a lesson from the GitS fiasco.
Think of how his kids must feel—to my eyes, they very much code as POC... I mean, how do they NOT grow up hating the color of their own skin? It boggles the mind how fucked up this is.
I get not playing colleges. Assuming he gets booked in the first place, why play a venue with such a tendency to draw people’s ire? I don’t think you have to be overly sensitive to just not want to deal with what could potentially end up being a huge hassle.
I would argue that I’m affected, albeit indirectly, by TRAP laws. But your point is well-taken nonetheless.
If all of that comes to pass and RBG is still alive, she needs to retire immediately at that point. Bless her heart, she is as mortal as the rest of us.
Seinfeld is (like many many many comedians) pro-say whatever you want within the ambit of a comedic bit without consequence -- but I think you’d be hard pressed to find anything racist or particularly sexist in his material. The man’s work is about as anodyne as it gets.
You’re talking about a guy whose opinions this past term on partisan and racist gerrymandering, and voting rights, were basically the fucking “shrug” emoji.
We have passed the point of compromise and niceties and if the Democratic leaders do not have the stomach for the battle, they need to be held accountable and pushed aside for the next group
I’m a Latino and grew up in Miami, so a great many of the people I grew up with (family, co-workers, close friends) are Latinx. I went to undergrad at FSU (Tallahassee, the Bible Belt), and my wife and her family are from the Northeast and are white Anglo-Saxon people—which I provide as evidence that I’m in a position…
we’d get dangerously close to the elimination of the human race.
he was like “I don’t think there’s actually the political will to do that” (i.e., actually repeal it). The man is the child of refugee immigrants and is very aware of the ways he is oppressed, but continually discounts challenges women face.
I’ve yet to date someone who didn’t need a few of these talks. I’m not saying they’re not out there, but I think they’re few in number.
“Surely all women are married to men having trouble to understand no to racially insult another person and then victim-blame them.”
What was the previously unexamined point of law that this case set a precedent for? There was no gendered dimension to the issues or ruling in case--this was a ruling based on literary analysis. The Judge’s opinion does not appear to have broken any new ground--it simply applied the rules as set forth by extant legal…