It's cool, I'm glad they did it but all I can think of are the high mark-ups and some reliability issues.

The only cost disadvantage is for Ford since the r&d is only being used on a very low volume trim.

By chance I just test drove a FRS with a TRD package. The package added a lot, some different springs, exhaust, interior changes and badges but you pay for it. Luckily I drove a standard version back to back, but even if the TRD wasn't yellow I would have been hard pressed to justify the $5k extra without an increase…

Unless it's a FRS ;(

Zero? ZERO deaths in one year in multiple models??? Waaaahhh?

Zero? ZERO deaths in one year in multiple models??? Waaaahhh?

Suzuki?

He's going to regret this.

It's the same argument I use against a 15 yr home loan vs a 30, flexibility.

Wash?

So will be like the first R32 and Mazdaspeed6 and be unusually slow? The overall reliability of Fords is also another question.

I see some of the Mercedes box fish.

The interior is probably the closest thing to the original and was one of the hallmarks of the NSX. So I'm sure they're actually proud of/happy with it.

That sucks. I hope it wasn't a new car.

There's also profit coming from the factory to the dealer. And when you add on trim levels and "accessories" there's even more profit. Not to mention crap like extended warranties that are part of the purchase price but where the dealer will make money. You can't say there's only $1000 in profit referencing the…

What is that music in the first video???

My point is there's more than $1000 profit in the sticker price.

I was expecting $3.50

Less than $1000 markup on a $30,000 vehicle? Do you mean less than $1000 over sticker? Let me guess, you're a car salesman.