He was a soulless ginger so you can’t really kill something that was never truly alive to begin with. 

Yeah idiots! That’s a gloryhole! God dammit people, do I have to tell you everything?

That’s because his political policies are almost uniformly terrible.

Grover Norquist is best known for whining about a tax pledge he made when he was twelve. Now he’s whining about a teenager’s past time. He is 60 years old.

Agreed, the shop I work at, three of us smoke. One vapes. (yea we’re all horrible human beings.) The three smokers go outside and smoke, the one moron vapes inside, while working on clients. I’m admittedly not the most researched on vaping, but in a situation where health and safety’s concerned. Breathing what smells…

Guy hitting .205 in High-A ball is worried about the wrong Mendoza.

Oh good. Our third party candidate for president is addressing vaping. I’m glad he isn’t addressing anything frivolous in this particular election year when all the candidates are so strong.

Because it was being touted as a “cure for smoking” when in reality it was simply just another format. Additionally, long term impacts do have links to cardiovascular problems, and addiction is usually not a great thing.

“Wars” in descending order of “things that should be brought up at a VP debate”:

Last I heard, all people are trying to do is :

The problem is you cannot lock down or control the groups, you end up with the exact same research you have for cigarettes. The end result being, as there is no study that states smoking causes lung cancer in humans, they continue to proclaim this to any detractors.

The difference is that those drugs are looking for side effects, when you are actively trying to see what/cause harm will come to a person by force feeding them, it is unethical. That is one of the cornerstones of the tobacco industry when they proudly proclaim “There is not a single study directly linking lung cancer…

Agnosticism is the only correct view on vaping. If somebody asks you where you stand, pro or con on vaping, your answer should always be “Honestly, I couldn’t give less of a shit.” And when somebody tries to further the conversation, loudly follow that up with “I. DON’T. GIVE. A. SHIT.”

It would have to be retrospective, just like the smoking studies were. There isn’t enough data (over time) to judge the effects yet.

The problem is, you cannot legally/ethically test the impact on humans, so we would be in the same boat as smoking, only seeing what happens decades down the road.

Counterpoint: Only pussies vape.

LOL, yea right “Chechnya”, that’s not even a real place.

In fairness when they yell “go back to your country” Toronto fans usually mean America.

Now I’m just throwing it out there. Maybe, just maybe, Trump might not be fit to be President.

it prevented the russians from taking over, duh