why does the man get to have cheerleading, then? that is the entire point of the article - this shit is lopsided

that's not actually true. it's possible to eat normally and be obese

i posted a link to the same story on another post. it's a no-win situation because putting wipes into a standard trash can is essentially like squatting over it and taking a shit. better to use something flushable and put it in the toilet

that's really gross

the problem with using wipes is that they should not be flushed. but NOT flushing them is pretty gross as well.

but it isn't anything - it is a shadow.

but a laptop definitely isn't present - you can see under her body and there isn't a laptop there. it isn't reasonable to suggest that something could be under her body when that space is clearly visible. it appears as though you don't want for there to be violence in this picture, which is a little odd

thank you for that information. it breaks my heart.

wow. i think... i am probably done with Jezebel. first the shit from/about Hugo Schwyzer, Anna Breslaw's holocaust denial, and now this. i feel like i can't support a website that seems to want to alienate its readers with controversy

without division there would be no conversation on these matters

the pressure doesn't apply to you if you already chose to have children. nobody needed to pressure you

you argued that people were suggesting others should have "ZERO emotional reaction". that didn't actually happen. and you suggested that people who do have such a reaction must be sociopaths. hyperbole doesn't make your point valid and you're arguing against things that were not stated in the first place

it's under her body and the light source is above her. i would say that suggesting a laptop is "reaching" because there isn't a laptop present.

if you have had attraction build over time, then obviously you don't fit in the description i gave. it's all in there.

there's no laptop, only her own shadow.

if your reaction is small and manageable, you wouldn't be complaining about it here. you're also arguing against something that people are not actually saying.

you know, i don't really buy the "attraction is attraction" idea. studies have shown that attraction is more likely to build over time, based on more than physical criteria. anyone who relies largely on appearance for who they choose to date is taking a different path, and it is a very shallow way to go about it. i…

no, it's the pattern of his dating choices. if he asked out a variety of women of all types, then it would be clear that he isn't just a shallow person trying to date women with a very particular appearance. but that is not the case - he seems to think he is entitled to a certain type

what is your regular account here? you created a sockpuppet to stir up shit, which is kind of cowardly

if you are that upset about rejection, you might want to suspend your activities in the dating realm and improve your self-esteem and learn to compartmentalize better before you commence again