Blind spots are the new “spelling words correctly”. You don’t go back and fix an error - “autocorrect’s got it”.

I was actually offered “$10k in barn board” for trade for a $6K car. Ummm, no thanks.

In 10 years:

That’s the info I was looking for - thanks. It’s not a comprehensive explanation but does give some context on the comparisons. It’s important enough that I expected it would be in the text of the article rather than a footnote.

The source website listed the used cars as “lightly used”. What criteria did they use to determine what fell in this category for their analysis?  Year? Mileage? That’s either a rather large omission or I’m just missing it.

Reviews and the questions are the worst:

Enthusiasts have been saying it forever now - the 86 needs more green!

That's what lift kits are for.

So we all agree then? .............this never happens.

The fundamental statement: “The trick here? That 30w at high temperature is lower viscosity than 5w at a low temperature.” is not right. The curve is flattened but it is gradual change between the measured points of the multigrade oil and never gets more viscous with rising temperature. All you have to do is look up a…

Incorrect you say?!  Please help us all understand the truth, random internet commenter.

Exemptions are written in for warm up and cool down periods. Reading them only takes a couple of minutes.

Exactly.

Dodge: You want lighter weight? Hit the gym.

5% more horsepower and 8% heavier.

That fun, more instant acceleration that you feel in “torquey” cars is actually due to higher HP output lower in the rev range. It’s the HP you want, higher low end torque just always means higher low end HP.

When they have low redlines - but who wants that in a sports car?

I like this green but find it does NOT work on the Rams.

It’s a joke dude - that 22" wheel is clearly not a hardcore off-road wheel.

Don’t do that! Those offroad-esque wheels aren’t meant to do anything that extreme!