Because they were state emails and not personal?

That just means the spirit of profit will not pass you over... you liberal fucks.

Fuck off. That’s regressive.

She gets a blank check for lying to the public and we still want to make her president.

Being intelligent isn’t your strong suit. So I’ll treat you like a child.

Fighting FOIA requests is pretty much the definition of being anti-democracy.

The issue is that her “status” meant all FOIA were just denied.

Why is my claim that Clinton is a member of the 1% and has desires that benefit said 1% “inaccurate”?

Well, there’s the excuse.

Except when you work for the federal government and they make a clear policy between public and private... and then you ignore it and claim victim.

Clinton is an upper-class women whose entire platform in terms of women helps already-well-off women while she waifs on questions like a 15/min wage.

You’re forced to sit with and break bread with people they think are terrible?

Can’t they get... no... aren’t they demanded, under Title IX, a specific bus and a separate competition? Like... if a school is forcing women to share a bus for different events that is clearly a T9 issue.

Most dining halls accommodate hundreds of students. You’re telling me the women have to eat with the men? That the women’s’ team has no choice but to sit with people they hate.

I have serious trouble when it comes to the dismissing she’d done to victims of her husband’s aggression.

If standards are based on whatever troglodyte we end up with nominated, then yes.

Weiner delivered one of the most intense and deciding speeches in the early Obama era.

You’re not an elected representative of the people nor do you work for one. Do you understand why we hold them to a far higher standard?

She used Tony’s computer as a convenience once.

Considering how much government agents want us to not know what is up in their actions this seems... an oversight.