Sort of. They are fancy. When you see and touch them you look at a work of utmost tidiness. Everything is different. The materials all mold together seamlessly. Are they worth a grand? Probably not. But they set the prices, not us.

I’m more offended by how ugly everything from Lily Pulitzer is and how desexualizing for adult women. What even are those dresses. Why do the pants fit so badly. What’s with the colors???

I hope not. Delores isn’t even a name. Dolores is. #EnoughWithStupidNameSpellings

I am interested by the word claustrophobic. I saw the 1999 movie because I thought Dominique Swain was the bees knees, and because I was 15 and thought myself quite the temptress. While I saw the movie from the “how cool” point of view, I remember a feeling of claustrophobia towards the middle and end. I couldn’t…

Lily Pulitzer dresses have no fashion value at all. They are expensive garbage and you don’t see them outside of Florida, maybe parts of California, and the Northeast. Lily Pulitzer is what you wear when you are a rich basic.

those hens looks like they like to blow shit up. The REAL cast of Bad Blood.

TV Shows in the Us only hire young, attractive people. Men sometimes get a pass but they still have to be somewhat handsome. Compare the cast of House to the cast of Casualty

American TV is more diverse racially, but everyone is gorgeous and under 25. There are no storylines for average looking or older people and women roles are horrible. As is the dialogue.

I think that all TV has to make huge bounds in terms of diversity and inclusiveness, but I do find British TV to be light years ahead of American. TV shows routine cast actors of varied ages who don’t all look like models. I just finished watching Broadchurch, and was so pleasantly surprised that the main characters…

OH MY GOD ME TOO. I was pretty embarrassed of that, because I was already 16. Now I think he would look like a skeevy late 90's guy who plays in a Stain cover band and wears flame t-shirts a la Fieri. But back then Trent was my sex god.

Yeah, it was in 2006 or 7? Before umbrella, so it was weird because she wasn’t even a household name yet. It was a great PR move though, suddenly she was known as the girl who insured her legs. I guess she directed the conversation, which is great of her, and other stars have done it too (no one talked about Britney’s…

Hopefully this isn’t body-shaming, but... I never understood the Rihanna leg thing? I feel like it became a thing after she supposedly insured her legs, not before. Like, suddenly everyone was saying that Rihanna has good legs because she insured them.

The casting choice is what confuses me the most.

I’d like to know if these women did this because they have no other option. Fast-food workers make embarrassingly low paychecks, many live in unsuitable housing, or are straight homeless.

“The cause of the fire is still being determined by forensic experts”. This should clear things up.

“Women aren’t conditioned or taught to have a pure and simple, yes-I-want-to-fuck-you approach to sex. At least, I wasn’t. The unequal power dynamic of the cat-and-mouse game hurts both men and women. When I was younger, it was the only game I knew.” THIS.

Did she say “we are always moving forward!!!!!” because mine did and I was like “uh, except we are not?”

no. It sucks and it’s for dumb people and I wanted to punch the instructor.

They are for stupid people who look for meaning but also status. On one hand the instructor says things like “something is shifting here folks! We are going on a journey, and we come back strong!”, on the other hand, you are paying a buttload of money to take the class. You know it, the people that go know it, and you…

I live in a town where tons of people do the whole Lance Armstrong costume to go “cycling” either indoors or out, but never leisurely. I must be the only person who uses a bicycle to go places. Overtime I ride it, someone or other is always delighted and surprised when I dress like a normal civilian and ride my bike…