Uh, yeah dude, no. At worst, he said Black women don’t matter. At best, he’s saying this is a Black woman problem and if you ignore them, the state’s statistics are in line with the rest of the country’s, which is still a fucking awful thing to say.

Oh my god this is so true. And I fucking love Beto but this describes him perfectly. 

He was right to do it and the fucking rednecks up on stage reacted predictably... hypocritically calling him out for incivility while using language that wouldn’t meet anyone’s definition of civility. 

It’s an American men problem. 

Unfortunately that’s not how Democracy works. 

This.

It is but it also points to errors being committed by Heard’s lawyers who didn’t coach her well enough. They should have known better than to let he mention a rumor in court that could easily be refuted by Depp’s lawyers and manipulated into making it look like Heard’s lying.

I believe that studies/polls show that an overwhelming majority of US citizens are in FAVOR of basic common sense gun control.

That’s just marketing. No one actually believes it, not the Republican politicians and not the voters. They just want racist politicians who oppose gun control and abortion and taxes and any kind of social policies that would make things better for women and children and marginalized groups. That’s the difference…

Nothing will change unless about 30% of the population suddenly disappears or stops voting for Republicans. 

Again, please quote where I said that we should ignore male victims or that their abuse is irrelevant? Please, I’d love to know what you’re basing your assumption on. All I said is that statistically, more women are affected and more women end up dead or injured.

If something isn’t proven then anything goes and there’s no logic to banning it.

I think they’re bloated, washed out and reactionary versions of their earlier selves (though I never did like Gervais but old Chappelle is gold), and instead of that being the demise of their careers, the cancel culture crowd is actually prolonging their careers and expanding their audiences with all the internet…

Is that supposed to be funny? He’s as unfunny as Gervais, just progressive. And the hyperactivity and shrieking is fucking obnoxious.

So you’re saying that in the absence of data we have to assume it’s true there’s a correlation? But my comment is the ridiculous one? Mmmkay.

Can you prove a correlation?

Can you prove a correlation?

I didn’t read their history, I was just as genuinely confused and thought you were making the point that he’s also gone after religious people as an example of other topics he shouldn’t be joking about. Clearly I was wrong. 

Understood, and sorry if I misunderstood your comment. It really wasn’t clear and given the other response you got I’m not the only one that thought so.

Right. And even if that is the case, it’s a problem because?