Huh. I thought the funny thing about PC Principal was that, when it came right down to it, he was still a white, cis, straight man in charge who didn’t actually listen to the people he was allegedly trying to help. PC by name but not by action. Perhaps I was giving them too much credit on that one.

You know SVU writers are drafting this story right now

I think we can rule out Derrick as a suspect if you just review his shooting percentage

Thank you. I am so sick of everyone parading her around like some fucking hero to the cause. She’s a criminal and a traitor and now she gets a free procedure that so many law-abiding trans individuals cannot afford. The only good thing about this news is that maybe we can finally stop hearing from her now.

What’s to stop the next NCO who wants surgery from committing a crime, being sent to prison and demanding the same treatment? The current statute that maintains prisoners transition at the moment of their conviction is an adequate compromise that doesn’t incentivize criminal behavior.

She was free to not commit the crime and have the surgery all on her own at any time she chose to.

Down South they call them “Sprinkles” because you don’t need a full shower but people insist on doing SOMETHING.

Who knows? As a Mexican, I hate that dumb term.

Not sending people to prison for non-violent crimes is not that radical an idea, actually.

Moose caca?!

Ladies and gents: I’ve been here at Jezebel for a loooooooong time now and I would like to welcome you all to Jezebel Wedding Bingo. Here are some of your squares

-City hall
-Simple dinner with friends
-Marriage is pointless and sexist
-Engagement rings are sexist
-Wedding dresses are sexist
-Choosing to take your husband’s…

I wouldn’t be terribly worried. eventually Apple will release a product that allows us to fuck our phones and then nobody will ever leave their house again.

as Gen X I am telling you, I am still using 14.4 speed dial up modem.

I never knew engagement rings could be lease to own. Interesting.

This is EXACTLY what is happening. Lots of publicity, and they don’t pay for the ad to actually run. Come on, people, you’re being played.

No, the reason the other ads got approved is because they are wearing underwear. It may be revealing, but it’s something. Lane Bryant knew this would get dinged—now they have a “story” and the ad is going to be seen as part of content in news stories everywhere, at no cost to them, and with no risk of being…

Knowing about how they had the same issue in 2010, I think they have figured out that they actually get way more engagement and eyeballs out of being banned (when was the last time you actually watched a commercial?). Good for them, it's smart as hell.

The television will not be revolutionized.

“R-E-S-P-E-T-O / find out what it means to yo”—hillary