calypsoclaudette
CalypsoClaudette
calypsoclaudette

I don’t have anything invested in the term either way.

That doesn’t make sense. I was using the term as he presented himself and I’m pretty sure you know that.

AJ Archer-Kane dismissed my reasonable comment to him. Here it is:

You’re right to certain extent. Each individual slight can be explained away. But if you take in the whole of his persona and the way he tries to present himself as an angry righteous man it’s problematic, especially with his history of trying to be a true SJW. He’s a hypocrite.

Welcome back bedbugs.

My comment wasn't about sneaking around. I was responding to he OPs stating the expectation that the partner should give up sex for the rest of their lives because they're have health problems.

I don't understand why a supposed loving partner would want their mate to give up sex for the rest of their lives because they have a medical condition. Why would it matter if they're having sex with someone else if they're emotionally monogamous with you?

Why you hate women?

I don't think we have that function. What were you going to say?

What are you trying to say with her picture? Do you think the Vanderbilt rape was exaggerated?