And see, I would agree that some people identified as “progressive” do act authoritarian, but I think targeting protesters (the vast majority of whom aren’t violent) and university policies (which are regulatory in a legal way) misdiagnoses the authoritarian tendencies. No, the authoritarian tendencies are with people…

Libertarians like rbldiver1 would rather make up criticisms of liberals then actually help oppose the fascists in the Republican party.

And once again you post a hasty generalization without any evidence to back it up. You are by far the laziest concern troll on this site.

Well aside from the fact that the show existed before Clarkson, of course I realize that he alone made it into the powerhouse of entertainment that it was for all those years. I’m also saying that he’s a huge liability, which is just a fact.

I’m not in favor of censorship by any means, but, well, this is Jeremy Clarkson we’re talking about: the dude who killed the best motoring show of all time with his big mouth (and bony fist). I’m sure Amazon is just trying to keep their new baby alive, which has got to be stressful given it’s particular ailment.

There’s a huge difference between taking it seriously as a work of art and whatever this review is.

FAIL! I could follow your writing.

The director of “Rogue One,” Gareth Edwards, has stepped into a mythopoetic stew so half-baked and overcooked, a morass of pre-instantly overanalyzed implications of such shuddering impact to the series’ fundamentalists, that he lumbers through, seemingly stunned or constrained or cautious to the vanishing point of…

I wrote something similar in high school when I read the book jacket but not the book but turned in a book report anyway.

I watched it and felt unnecessarily bad for Watanabe

He is not a monster, just a man that really screwed up and has been paying in many ways.”

Nobody who says “cuck” in earnest has ever had an opinion worth reading or hearing, much less responding to. They are an impotent and angry little circlejerk in a sad, squalid corner of the internet. Don’t shine light on them.

You know what happens when you use the term “cuck” as an insult? You look like a pathetic coward, because only someone who’s immersed themselves in the internet alt-right echo chamber and is afraid to go out and interact with real people think that term is the devastating barb you silly chucklefucks believe it to be.

And yet none of the tattoos she linked to were hand or neck tattoos, which is what he explicitly refused to do.

The Petty White Girl butt hurt is REAL!!!

Exactly; you think that their policy is “incorrect” and “wrong”. It’s their policy, based on their own reasons. They don’t need to justify it to you, the author, or anyone else - they are allowed to have whatever policies they want, as long as they don’t deny or infringe upon anyone’s rights or break any laws. If this…

He’s not refusing HER neck tattoo, he’s refusing ALL neck tattoos. This is a fairly common policy in tattoo shops, and she should have done some research to find someone who would do a neck tattoo instead of just walking into a random shop, and then throwing an entitled, hissy fit when the people there wouldn’t do…

This article is the literal equivalent of “I’ll show HIM!” and “If you piss me off, I’m leaving a bad Yelp review.”

White girl outrage is always petty. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I don’t get what you’re trying to accomplish by mocking his work?