You seemed, to me, to make a statement to the effect that because she is at all mentally ill she should not be found legally responsible for the consequences of her actions. I may or may not have misread your post, but my response was polite - I said her texts indicate she can tell right from wrong, which is what…

“As AllRushIsViolence said below, she knows right and wrong...”

Get back to me in a year or so and I will start caring about the next movie. I just CANNOT be hyped from now until the end of 2017, just cant do it.

Jesus looks like he’s trying to train raptors in this shot.

They don’t need the money or the exposure. Should they be leaping at the chance to spend several days in close quarters with a Stepford wife religious fanatic? Team Olsen twins!

This this this. Posted about this in the comments of another article. There is been no trial, there has been no verdict. People need to stop using those words.

The Court is NOT on Dr. Luke’s “side.” The Judge merely applied the law to the facts. As an attorney one of the hardest things to deal with are bad facts. They are what they are and we do our best to construe them most favorably to our clients but ultimately Judges have no discretion to choose a “side” they like. It’s…

As I understand this, it was a ruling against her request for a preliminary injunction to record music outside of Dr. Luke/Sony. The judge quite rightly denied that request. The judge also quite rightly denied Dr. Luke’s request to throw out the sexual assault claims. She can still win after she submits proof of her…

My heart goes out to Kesha, but it sounds the judge’s hands were tied. This case was strictly a matter of contract law. If the judge ruled in the artist’s favor, she would be setting precedent that any contract could be broken simply by alleging- not proving, simply alleging- abuse.

Can we blind him then?

I’m not aware of Ancestry’s connection with “the government” but I do know they’re connected to the Mormon (LDS) church. In frankness giving the Mormons my DNA scares me more than giving it to “the government”.

It’s interesting, but those who were similarly ambivalent about Cosby were pretty much dismissed.

Yeah, but this is inapplicable to her. She still believes, as an adult, that it was not coercion. It bothers me when people take the narrative away from the person they are claiming was a victim. It’s her story and her decision to determine whether she was a victim or not.

Thirded. A lot of feminist/social justice writing refuses to acknowledge the grey, when most things are grey.

Thanks for reminding me. now I’m sad...

I appreciate your willingness to write a story that reflects deep ambivalence.

I appreciate your willingness to write a story that reflects deep ambivalence. I think there isn’t enough of that anymore (everything is always strident and polarized) but you did a great job sitting with the murkiness of what this all means about Bowie’s legacy.