cajod
Cajod
cajod

Cruises are waaaaaaaaay more fun if you go with a group of friends but they’re pretty good on their own.

This looks like fun to me...am I weird?

My wife found out she was pregnant the day we got back from a week long stay at an all-inclusive in Mexico. She is 90% certain that she actually got pregnant the week before we left. My kid was swimming in tequila and he came out just fine...

TLDR; you forgot about Ray Finkle when you mentioned the Dolphins.

It’s nice to see all of these methods laid out Sous Vide Sous.

Always look on the bright side of life!

The ethical question is to be answered by the business owner and the delivery person, not the consumer. You have Pizza joint A and Pizza Joint B. Each business advertises that they can deliver your pizza and do not refuse service based on weather. How they meet that demand is a question for the business to answer, not

Missed opportunity on that tweet. They didn’t save his bacon, they saved his pork and beans.

Ahem

Ahem

To be fair, there is a decent chance this won’t work in Minnesota’s snow either.

To be fair, there is a decent chance this won’t work in Minnesota’s snow either.

Interesting preliminary results. As someone who has been diagnosed with NAFLD I would love to see a wider study. I really do enjoy drinking socially but I have no trouble abstaining for long periods of time. I’ve only had one beer since New Year’s Eve, I wonder if that would be enough to undo or derail these benefits.

I had this exact thought but didn’t state it quite so well! They want us to be Bromerica! We bumped into them at the bar and Fox wants us to say, “come at me bro.”

The coverage of this was hilarious in it’s absurdity (it was on at the gym). What would they want the administration to do differently?!?!? What do they want Iran to have done differently?!?!?! As far as international incidents go this was like the US accidentally bumping into Iran at a bar and spilling their drink.

Yes, but we’re specifically discussing the argument that the act of darkening one’s skin is an inherently racist act. In the absence of the blackface minstrel tradition, it is not.

I have a pretty decent idea how patronizing I’m being, it was a self-indulgent response to the condescending tone of the article itself.

In answer to your questions:

Thank you very much!

I posted this in response to another comment but I found that it works fairly well as a response to this article as a whole so I wanted to paste it as a direct reply to the article as well:

If you truly believe that the color of one’s skin is a purely cosmetic difference, how does the altering of one’s skin tone automatically equal mockery? We do not consider those who dye their hair or who don the garb of another culture, so long it is done in the celebration of that culture, to be mocking out of hand.

...That’s not blackface.